Stupid question - is it possible to use up all the oxygen in your room?

  • Thread starter Thread starter bumclouds
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Oxygen Stupid
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the question of whether it is possible to deplete the oxygen in a sealed room to dangerous levels over time. Participants explore the implications of room sealing, oxygen consumption, and the effects of carbon dioxide accumulation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions if staying in a sealed room for several days could reduce oxygen levels to dangerous levels.
  • Another participant asserts that if the room is completely sealed with no oxygen source, it is indeed possible to run out of oxygen.
  • A further inquiry is made about the time it would take to deplete oxygen and whether a small gap could allow enough oxygen to enter to sustain life.
  • One response suggests studying partial differential equations to understand airflow through small openings, emphasizing the need for precise calculations regarding room sealing.
  • Another participant mentions that a well-sealed building would require continuous ventilation to maintain air quality, noting that carbon dioxide buildup is the critical issue rather than oxygen depletion.
  • A later reply indicates that while oxygen levels can decrease, the body would likely fail to utilize oxygen before it is completely depleted due to low partial pressure.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of depleting oxygen in a sealed room, with some emphasizing the role of carbon dioxide buildup as a more immediate concern. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the specifics of how oxygen levels would change over time in various sealing scenarios.

Contextual Notes

Assumptions about room construction materials, the size of potential openings, and the effects of temperature on air quality are mentioned but not fully explored. The discussion does not resolve the mathematical aspects of airflow or the exact conditions under which oxygen depletion would occur.

bumclouds
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I have a stupid question to ask you all.

Let's just say that you shut your door, and then shut all your windows so there isn't any ventilation and stayed in your room for several days. Could you end up breathing until you've reduced the oxygen to dangerous levels?
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
If it's completely sealed and there's no other source of oxygen, then sure.
 
And how long would it take to run out of oxygen?

I often wonder if there's a tiny little gap of say, 1 square cm to the outside world, would you rate of oxygen consumption beat the inflow of oxygen?
 
Stupid question, you bet you!
Not so stupid answer though:
Go study partial differential equations, and determine for yourself the air flow given the size of the hole, temperature, etc... after factoring in all these variables then determine how big the hole has to be. Btw, in a room built out of wood, the oxygen would still get through, so this needs to be a room of plastic; why don't you tell us how big the whole has to be to substain life? Go now, study :p
 
The short answer is that you'd need a ridiculously well sealed building to create such a problem. I once ran across a building that used to be a FEMA office and it was designed pretty air tight, so it required continuous ventilation to keep the air quality acceptable.

Note, though, that you can't "use up all the oxygen" in a room: It isn't lack of oxygen that would kill you, it is too much CO2.
 
If you use completely compartmentalized room then yes. But When the O2 level decrease to certain level the partial pressure of O2 is so low that haemoglobin would not combine with oxygen, then you are just going to die before it is completely used up. So It's never going to "use up" literally.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
12K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
89K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K