SUMMARY
The discussion centers on the submission process for the journal Classical and Quantum Gravity. After one month of "awaiting referee reports," the paper transitioned to "awaiting decision" for two weeks. Participants concluded that a delay in the decision-making process is typical and does not indicate any issues with the submission. Authors are advised to remain patient and continue working on other projects during this waiting period.
PREREQUISITES
- Understanding of academic paper submission processes
- Familiarity with journal review timelines
- Knowledge of the Classical and Quantum Gravity journal
- Experience with managing multiple research projects
NEXT STEPS
- Research the typical timelines for peer review in academic publishing
- Learn about the editorial decision-making process in scientific journals
- Explore strategies for managing research projects during submission waits
- Investigate common reasons for delays in academic paper reviews
USEFUL FOR
Researchers, academic authors, and graduate students involved in publishing papers in scientific journals, particularly those submitting to Classical and Quantum Gravity.