Can Submodules of a Noetherian Module Fail to Intersect with a Given Submodule?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Math Amateur
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    module Modules
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Proposition 4.2.5 from Paul E. Bland's "Rings and Their Modules," specifically regarding Noetherian modules and their submodules. Participants clarify that if submodules \( M_i \) and \( N \) are both submodules of \( M \), then \( M_i \cap N \) cannot be empty. Additionally, it is established that if \( x \in M_i \), then \( x + N \) is indeed an element of \( (M_i + N)/N \) due to the properties of submodules. The proof remains valid even if \( M_n \cap N = 0 \), as the zero-module is defined as \( \{ 0 \} \).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Noetherian modules
  • Familiarity with submodule properties in module theory
  • Knowledge of ascending chains of submodules
  • Basic concepts of quotient modules
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Noetherian conditions on module chains
  • Explore the concept of zero-modules in module theory
  • Learn about the structure of quotient modules in detail
  • Investigate the proofs surrounding Proposition 4.2.5 in "Rings and Their Modules"
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, graduate students in algebra, and anyone studying module theory who seeks a deeper understanding of Noetherian modules and their properties.

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Paul E. Bland's book, "Rings and Their Modules".

I am focused on Section 4.2: Noetherian and Artinian Modules and need some help to fully understand the proof of part of Proposition 4.2.5 ... ...

Proposition 4.2.5 reads as follows:
View attachment 8188
https://www.physicsforums.com/attachments/8189My questions are as follows:Question 1

In the above text from Bland we read the following:

" ... ... Conversely, suppose that $$N$$ and $$M/N$$ are noetherian. Let$$M_1 \subseteq M_2 \subseteq M_3 \subseteq \ ... \ ... $$be an ascending chain of submodules of $$M$$. Then $$M_1 \cap N \subseteq M_2 \cap N \subseteq M_3 \cap N \subseteq \ ... \ ...$$ ... ... "My question is ... what about the case where all the $$M_i$$ fail to intersect with $$N$$ ... is this possible ... if so how does the proof read then ...?
Question 2

In the above text from Bland we read the following:

" ... ... If $$i \ge n$$ and $$x \in M_i$$ then $$x + N \in (M_i + N)/N = (M_n + N)/N$$ ... ... "My question is ... why does $$x \in M_i \Longrightarrow x + N \in (M_i + N)/N$$ ... ... is it because ...

$$x \in M_i \Longrightarrow x + 0_N + N \in (M_i + N)/N$$ ...

... and $$x + 0_N + N = x + N$$ ... ... ?
Hope someone can help ...

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Q1: $M_i$ and $N$ are both submodules of $M$, therefore $M_i \cap N$ can never be empty.

If $M_n \cap N = 0$ then of course $M_i \cap N = 0$ for $i \leq n$. ($0 = \{ 0 \}$ is the zero-module.)

The proof, however, remains the same.

Q2: if $x \in M_i$ then $x \in M_i + N$ and. because $N \leq M_i + N$, we have $x + N \in (M_i + N)/N$
 
steenis said:
Q1: $M_i$ and $N$ are both submodules of $M$, therefore $M_i \cap N$ can never be empty.

If $M_n \cap N = 0$ then of course $M_i \cap N = 0$ for $i \leq n$. ($0 = \{ 0 \}$ is the zero-module.)

The proof, however, remains the same.

Q2: if $x \in M_i$ then $x \in M_i + N$ and. because $N \leq M_i + N$, we have $x + N \in (M_i + N)/N$
Thanks for thr help Steenis ...

Peter
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K