How Do You Find a Basis for the Subspace Orthogonal to a Given Vector in ℝ3?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MarcL
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis Subspace
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding a basis for the subspace S in ℝ3, which consists of vectors orthogonal to the vector (1, 2, 3). It is established that set S is a plane, as it is spanned by two linearly independent vectors that satisfy the orthogonality condition, represented by the equation a·(1, 2, 3) = 0. The dot product is identified as the primary tool for demonstrating orthogonality, and the process of row reduction is suggested to determine the dimension of the subspace.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector orthogonality in ℝ3
  • Knowledge of the dot product and its application
  • Familiarity with linear independence and spanning sets
  • Basic skills in row reduction of matrices
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of orthogonal vectors in vector spaces
  • Learn about the geometric interpretation of planes in ℝ3
  • Explore the method of finding bases for subspaces using row reduction
  • Investigate the Gram-Schmidt process for orthonormal bases
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in linear algebra, mathematicians working with vector spaces, and anyone interested in understanding the geometric properties of orthogonal vectors in ℝ3.

MarcL
Messages
170
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Let S, a subspace of ℝ3 be the set of vectors orthogonal to vector (1,2,3)
a)describe Set S
b) find a basis for Set S

2. Relevant Equations

That a basis has to be linearly independent and span R^3

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I would do this:
I know that vector (1,2,3) is the cross product of 2 vectors v1xv2
so I could put it in a matrix (where v1=a,b,c and v2=d,e,f)

a b c
d e f

But I am lost as to describe set S... Wouldn't I need to row reduce to see which variable is free, and then I could say whether or not it is a line or a plane ( well the dimension)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MarcL said:

Homework Statement


Let S, a subspace of ℝ3 be the set of vectors orthogonal to vector (1,2,3)
a)describe Set S
b) find a basis for Set S

2. Relevant Equations

That a basis has to be linearly independent and span R^3

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
I would do this:
I know that vector (1,2,3) is the cross product of 2 vectors v1xv2
so I could put it in a matrix (where v1=a,b,c and v2=d,e,f)

a b c
d e f
What's another way to show that an arbitrary vector <x, y, z> is orthogonal to a given vector <1, 2, 3>?
MarcL said:
But I am lost as to describe set S... Wouldn't I need to row reduce to see which variable is free, and then I could say whether or not it is a line or a plane ( well the dimension)
If you take constant multiples of the given vector <1, 2, 3>, what sort of geometric object do you get? What's the dimension of this subspace?
 
What you attempt is to find a,b,c,d,e,f such that (a,b,c) x (d,e,f) = (1,2,3)
Might seem reasonable, but it's a bit tedious: you want to find six variables from three equations. And you don't really need the lengths (that comes in part b).

Orthogonal to a vector ##\vec v## is anything that has ##\vec a \cdot \vec v = 0 ## with ##|\vec a| > 0\;##. That's only one equation with three unknowns.
Pick a vector v1 that satisfies that equation.
Pick a different one and call that v2.
I think then you have a basis already according to this link (exercise doesn't ask for orthogonal or orthonormal basis !)

But if you do want them orthonormal you can do v1 x (1,2,3) to get a v2 that is perpendicular to both.
Then normalize v1 and v2.

Re describing S: Why do you think there is the possibility that S is a line ?
 
Ah I see what you're getting at, once I've found two indepedent solutions i can just put it in a matrix and solve it. I see what you mean by not spanning R^3 too. it will span R^2 if I understand correctly.

Mark44 said:
What's another way to show that an arbitrary vector <x, y, z> is orthogonal to a given vector <1, 2, 3>?

I could also find the dot product, apart from that I am not too sure what I could use to prove the orthogonality. Geometrically speaking it is a plane, so the vector would be the normal.

As for the post above me, I meant in any case ( wasn't solved and I wasn't entirely sure). However, I expected it to be a plane.
 
The dot product is the primary tool to show orthogonality.

Yes, set S is a plane.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K