Subspace/induced/relative Topology Definition

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter filter54321
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Topology
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the definition of Subspace, Induced, and Relative Topology within the context of a topological space (A, τ). The subspace topology on a subset B ⊆ A is defined as τB = {0, B, B ∩ u1, B ∩ u2, ..., B ∩ un}, where τ represents the topology of A. A critical point raised is the assumption that there are only finitely many open sets, which is incorrect; the definition should account for all elements U in τ. The standard set-builder notation is clarified, emphasizing that U is an element of τ.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic topology concepts, including topological spaces and open sets.
  • Familiarity with set-builder notation and its application in mathematical definitions.
  • Knowledge of the relationship between subsets and their parent topological spaces.
  • Ability to interpret mathematical symbols and definitions accurately.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of topological spaces in detail, focusing on open and closed sets.
  • Explore the implications of infinite versus finite open sets in topology.
  • Learn about the different types of topologies, including product and quotient topologies.
  • Investigate examples of subspace topology in various mathematical contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of topology, and anyone seeking a deeper understanding of subspace topology and its applications in higher mathematics.

filter54321
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
I'm having trouble understanding the definition of a Subspace/Induced/Relative Topology. The definitions I'm finding either don't define symbols well (at all).

If I understand correctly the definition is:

Given:
-topological space (A,\tau)
-\tau={0,A,u1,u2,...un}
-subset B\subsetA

The subspace topology on B will be the intersection of B and every part of the topology of A

OR

\tauB={0,B,B\bigcapu1,B\bigcapu2,...B\bigcapun}


...I apologize in advance for my LATEX work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That looks correct idea for the subspace topology... but there is a serious problem in your understanding of topology: you seem to be assuming there are only finitely many open sets.
 
The u's are finite for illustrative purposes. I wanted to avoid using the form given by Wikipedia because it has insufficient textual explanation.

They have this definition, but don't specify exactly what a U is:

\tauB={B\bigcapU|U\in\tau}

It seems that me that you need to say how U fits into the first topology.
 
filter54321 said:
They have this definition, but don't specify exactly what a U is:
Yes they do: they say a U is an element of \tau.

This is standard set-builder syntax for replacement: on the right of | you introduce a variable and its domain, and on the left of the | you have a function of that variable indicating what should go into the set you're building.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K