Substituting the angular velocity and moment of inertia

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the verification of a physics problem involving angular momentum and kinetic energy conservation during a collision between a bullet and a block. The user correctly applies the conservation of angular momentum, deriving the final angular velocity as w = (m/(m + M)) * (v/l). The moment of inertia is calculated as I = (m + M) l^2, leading to the conclusion that kinetic energy is not conserved in this inelastic collision, as shown by the comparison of initial and final kinetic energies. The user’s methodology and results are confirmed as accurate.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum and its conservation principles
  • Familiarity with the concepts of moment of inertia and rotational kinetic energy
  • Knowledge of inelastic collisions and their characteristics
  • Basic proficiency in algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of inelastic collisions in detail
  • Learn about the derivation and application of the moment of inertia for various shapes
  • Explore the relationship between linear and angular momentum
  • Investigate the conservation of energy in different types of collisions
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics, as well as educators seeking to clarify concepts related to angular momentum and energy conservation in collisions.

Nono713
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
615
Reaction score
4
Hello, I need some help verifying whether what I did is correct.

Homework Statement



Attached is a screenshot of the problem.

Homework Equations



Angular momentum [itex]L = \vec{r} × m\vec{v} = mvr \sin{\theta}[/itex]
Conservation of angular momentum.

The Attempt at a Solution



This is my solution:

a) Before the collision, the block's angular momentum is zero (since it is at rest), and the angular momentum of the bullet is [itex]l mv \sin(\frac{\pi}{2}) = mvl[/itex], since the bullet's velocity vector and the block's direction vector to the pivot are perpendicular, so the total angular momentum of the system before the collision is [itex]mvl[/itex].

b) The bullet and block stick together, so from conservation of angular momentum the bullet + block system must have angular velocity [itex]mvl[/itex]. This means that:

[itex]m v l = (m + M) v_f l[/itex]

Where [itex]v[/itex] is the bullet's initial velocity and [itex]v_f[/itex] is the velocity after collision.

So [itex]v_f = \frac{m}{m + M} v[/itex]

And [itex]v_f = lw[/itex], so [itex]w = \frac{v_f}{l}[/itex] the angular momentum after the collision must then be:

[itex]w = \dfrac{\dfrac{m}{m + M} v}{l}[/itex]

c) Before the collision, the kinetic energy is purely linear, the kinetic energy is the block at rest is zero, and the kinetic energy of the bullet is [itex]\frac{1}{2} m v^2[/itex]. After the collision, the kinetic is purely rotational, with angular velocity [itex]w[/itex] (found above) and mass [itex]m + M[/itex].

Because the rod is massless, the system's center of mass is the block's center of mass. So after the collision, the system is rotating about the pivot, so the system's moment of inertia is:

[itex]I = (m + M) l^2[/itex]

So its rotational kinetic energy must be [itex]K = \frac{1}{2} I w^2[/itex]

Substituting the angular velocity and moment of inertia in, we get [itex]K = \frac{1}{2} (m + M) l^2 \left ( \dfrac{\dfrac{m}{m + M} v}{l} \right )^2[/itex]

Which simplifies to to [itex]K = \frac{1}{2} \frac{m^2}{m + M} v^2[/itex]

So before the collision, [itex]K = \frac{1}{2} m v^2[/itex], and after the collision, [itex]K = \frac{1}{2} \frac{m^2}{m + M} v^2[/itex]. Clearly the fraction [itex]\frac{m^2}{m + M}[/itex] will always be less than [itex]m[/itex] so kinetic energy is not conserved: the collision is inelastic.

----

So did I get this right? I generally suck at physics (although good at math) so I'm pretty sure I messed up at some point, but the results I get kind of seem to work, so I don't know :mad:
 

Attachments

  • Capture.png
    Capture.png
    19.4 KB · Views: 513
Physics news on Phys.org
Your methods and results look fine.
 

Similar threads

Replies
335
Views
17K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K