MHB Subtracting mixed fractions help

botswana
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi, I'm new. Please bear with me because I'm not familiar with the code of this forum.

I don't know how to enter a mixed fraction correctly, so I'm just going to write it out. Here is the problem:

Four and five-ninths minus 2/3

Can someone explain to me why the answer is three and eight-ninths? I know that's the answer because the textbook I'm using says so, but I haven't been able to figure out why.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would convert to improper fractions:

$4\frac{5}{9}-\dfrac{2}{3}=\dfrac{9\cdot4+5}{9}-\dfrac{2}{3}=\dfrac{41}{9}-\dfrac{2}{3}$

Now, get a common denominator:

$$\frac{41}{9}-\frac{2}{3}\cdot\frac{3}{3}=\frac{41}{9}-\frac{6}{9}=\frac{41-6}{9}=\frac{35}{9}$$

Now express as a mixed fraction:

$\dfrac{35}{9}=\dfrac{3\cdot9+8}{9}=3+\dfrac{8}{9}=3\frac{8}{9}$

Does that make sense?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top