Suff. condition for exact differential - PROOF?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the conditions for a differential form to be exact, specifically focusing on the proof related to Clairaut's theorem regarding the equality of mixed second partial derivatives. The scope includes theoretical aspects of differential forms and mathematical proofs.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant states that the condition for a differential form to be exact is that the second partial derivatives are equal, seeking a proof for this assertion.
  • Another participant explains that if M(x,y) dx + N(x,y) dy is exact, it implies the existence of a function F(x,y) such that M(x,y) = ∂F/∂x and N(x,y) = ∂F/∂y. They reference Clairaut's theorem, which states that for well-behaved functions, the mixed second partial derivatives are equal, leading to the condition ∂N/∂x = ∂M/∂y.
  • A subsequent participant questions how to prove Clairaut's theorem itself.
  • Another participant suggests looking up Clairaut's theorem in mathematical texts or online resources for further understanding.
  • Additional links to resources explaining the proof of Clairaut's theorem are provided by another participant.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus on the proof of Clairaut's theorem, as the discussion includes requests for clarification and additional resources rather than a definitive agreement on the proof itself.

Contextual Notes

The discussion does not resolve the assumptions or conditions under which Clairaut's theorem holds, nor does it clarify the specific requirements for the functions involved.

Trave11er
Messages
71
Reaction score
0
...is that second partial derivatives are equal - how to prove it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If [itex]M(x,y) dx + N(x,y) dy[/itex] is exact, that means it equals [itex]dF[/itex] for some function [itex]F(x,y)[/itex]. But the chain rule says that [itex]dF=\frac{\partial F}{\partial x}dx+ \frac{\partial F}{\partial y}dy[/itex], which implies that [itex]M(x,y) = \frac{\partial F}{\partial x}[/itex] and [itex]N(x,y) = \frac{\partial F}{\partial y}[/itex]. Now Clairaut's theorem states that (for well-behaved functions) the mixed 2nd partial derivatives are equal, i.e. [itex]\frac{\partial^{2}F}{\partial x \partial y}=\frac{\partial^{2}F}{\partial y \partial x}[/itex], which in terms of M and N becomes [itex]\frac{\partial N}{\partial x}=\frac{\partial M}{\partial y}[/itex]. That's the condition for exact differentials.

I hope that helps.
 
Ok, then the question is how to probe the Clairaut's theorem.
 
I would suggest you start by looking it up. It should be given in any Mathematical Analysis text and in any good Calculus text. Or google it on the internet.

There are several theorems with that name you want:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Symmetry_of_second_derivatives
or
http://www.sju.edu/~pklingsb/clairaut.pdf
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K