Suggestions for studying Electromagnetism

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on effective strategies for studying electromagnetism, particularly using Griffith's "Introduction to Electrodynamics." The participants recommend foundational knowledge in wave mechanics and optics, suggesting resources like Prof. Ramamurti Shankar's "Fundamentals of Physics" and Prof. Manoj Harbola's electromagnetism course. The consensus is that while prior knowledge in waves is beneficial, it is not strictly necessary, and students can learn these concepts concurrently with electromagnetism. Additionally, engaging with exercises at the end of chapters in Griffith's book is encouraged, as they reinforce understanding and problem-solving skills.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics concepts, particularly mechanics and dynamics.
  • Familiarity with Griffith's "Introduction to Electrodynamics."
  • Basic knowledge of wave mechanics and optics.
  • Mathematical skills for problem-solving in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Prof. Ramamurti Shankar's "Fundamentals of Physics Part 1 and Part 2."
  • Explore Prof. Manoj Harbola's electromagnetism lecture series.
  • Practice exercises from Griffith's book, focusing on end-of-chapter problems.
  • Review wave mechanics concepts to enhance understanding of Maxwell's equations.
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for electromagnetism courses, educators seeking teaching resources, and anyone looking to strengthen their understanding of electromagnetic theory and its mathematical foundations.

dRic2
Gold Member
Messages
887
Reaction score
225
(Hope I posted in the right section)

Hi, starting from next semester I will have to attend classes that require a "decent" understanding of electromagnetism. I know very little about it though (it's a very long story...) so I started to study Griffith's book. At least I know the mathematics well enough to understand it (not tensor), so this speeds up the process of learning, but, of course, it takes a lot of time.
Then it came to me that usually most students, before attending an EM course, have already studied waves mechanics and optics in general physics courses. Well, I didn't (still long story...). Anyway I know the mathematics for a basic understanding and I know something about the physics too, but not much in detail.

Do you think I should study waves and a little bit of optic first to better understand EM, or I can skip it and study it later if I have the time (I'm planning to study it anyway) ?

thanks
Ric
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wave mechanics is generally required only when you reach Maxwell's Wave equation. That is where you need to know the general wave equation. I don't remember needing optics while studying electromagnetism.

However, if you need, you can refer to these two courses which are on basic physics: Fundamentals of Physics Part 1 and Part 2 by Prof. Ramamurti Shankar. Part 1 is basically the mechanics and dynamics and relativity, while part 2 has introductory electromagnetism and optics and some quantum mechanics as well. In addition, the lecture notes are available in book form: Fundamentals of Physics Volume 1 and Volume 2. But you don't need the books very much if you like the lectures. Refer to the lectures when you need. I have myself learned from those lectures, so they are good.

In addition, for you can have a look at this lecture course in electromagnetism, because I feel that when someone teaches you, things become a bit easier: Electromagnetism by Prof. Manoj Harbola. This course is in a good depth and you might consider having a look at it. It covers everything that Prof. Shankar covers, but in more details. If you can't understand at first, you might have to go back to Prof. Shankar's course and attend the electromagnetism part.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dRic2
Thanks for all the material, but I think I'll stick to Griffith's book because I prefer to study on books. I think I'm going to skip optics and learn something about waves mechanics on the way.

PS: I'll definitively watch the youtube lectures for "intellectual pleasure" ;)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Wrichik Basu
dRic2 said:
Thanks for all the material, but I think I'll stick to Griffith's book because I prefer to study on books. I think I'm going to skip optics and learn something about waves mechanics on the way.

If you can pick up Griffith's and study from it, then you have almost everything you need. It is when you come across something and you have no idea how it was derived or where it came from that you will need to go look elsewhere.

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: dRic2
Hi, I would like to ask for one more advice.

I've studied the first two chapters and a bit of the third and I did all the exercise "on the way" (the ones between paragraphs - not the ones at the end of each chapter).
Since I have other courses to attend (and to study) I try to dedicate 2 hours at night to Griffiths' book, but the time is still limited. I know that the more exercise I do the better, but what do you think about the exercises at the end of the chapters ?

Should I skip them and maybe take a look at them in the future or should I try to solve as much as I can ?

Note that I'm talking about the exercise at the end of the chapters, not the on "in the middle".
 
dRic2 said:
Hi, I would like to ask for one more advice.

I've studied the first two chapters and a bit of the third and I did all the exercise "on the way" (the ones between paragraphs - not the ones at the end of each chapter).
Since I have other courses to attend (and to study) I try to dedicate 2 hours at night to Griffiths' book, but the time is still limited. I know that the more exercise I do the better, but what do you think about the exercises at the end of the chapters ?

Should I skip them and maybe take a look at them in the future or should I try to solve as much as I can ?

Note that I'm talking about the exercise at the end of the chapters, not the on "in the middle".

What I generally do when I'm pressed for time and am considering problem sets that aren't required:

Essentially skim through them and see if the "first solution" is immediately obvious after reading the problem statement. That is, don't default to doing each problem, but quickly ask yourself if you are certain of the approach that you would take. If the appropriate techniques are not obvious, then you may have found a problem that will offer more benefit for the time you spend, rather than spending time grinding through the algebra on a process that's already very familiar to you.

Of course, if you tend to be overconfident, you may end up skipping more problems than you should be. On the flip side, if you lack confidence, doing extra (but perhaps unnecessary) practice problems will help build confidence.
 
undefined314 said:
What I generally do when I'm pressed for time and am considering problem sets that aren't required:

Essentially skim through them and see if the "first solution" is immediately obvious after reading the problem statement. That is, don't default to doing each problem, but quickly ask yourself if you are certain of the approach that you would take. If the appropriate techniques are not obvious, then you may have found a problem that will offer more benefit for the time you spend, rather than spending time grinding through the algebra on a process that's already very familiar to you.

Of course, if you tend to be overconfident, you may end up skipping more problems than you should be. On the flip side, if you lack confidence, doing extra (but perhaps unnecessary) practice problems will help build confidence.

What about those exercises that requires to go through the math and maybe use some "tricks" to avoid endless calculations? Maybe the idea behind those exercise seems straightforward, but we you really have to carry out the solution you eventually get stuck due to lack of "skills" rather than lack of knowledge.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K