Hey!(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Can it be concluded generally that:

[tex]

\sum_r dx_r = 0

[/tex]

...because we are summing an infinitesimaly small variable a finite number of times, in contrast to an integral which is an infinite sum of infinitesimaly small variables? In one of my books a probability is given by:

[tex]

p_r = \frac{1}{Z} Exp[-\beta E_r]

[/tex]

... and in the next line they write that:

[tex]

\sum_r dp_r = 0

[/tex]

Does someone have an explanation to this?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Sum of an infinitesimal variable

Loading...

Similar Threads - infinitesimal variable | Date |
---|---|

I Derivative of infinitesimal value | Jan 15, 2018 |

I Function of 2 variables, max/min test, D=0 and linear dependence | Dec 19, 2017 |

I Epsilon-delta vs. infinitesimal | Jan 28, 2017 |

B Using infinitesimals to find the volume of a sphere/surface | Jun 3, 2016 |

Find infinitesimal displacement in any coordinate system | Nov 15, 2015 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**