Sum of arbitrary vertex to midpoint vectors

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Joffan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sum Vectors Vertex
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof that vectors from the vertices of a triangle to the midpoint of the opposite edge sum to zero, extending this property to a general set of points \{A_0, A_1, \ldots A_n\}. The midpoints, denoted as ##a_k##, are shown to be integral in forming a set of vectors ##\stackrel{\rightarrow}{A_ra_s}## that also sum to zero. The proof involves recognizing that the vector sum includes scaled loops from midpoints and closed loops formed by remaining vectors, ultimately confirming the sum equals zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector notation and operations
  • Familiarity with midpoints and their geometric significance
  • Knowledge of modular arithmetic in indexing
  • Basic principles of vector summation and closure
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector operations in Euclidean space
  • Explore geometric properties of midpoints in polygons
  • Learn about modular arithmetic and its applications in geometry
  • Investigate closed loops in vector spaces and their implications
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, geometry enthusiasts, and anyone interested in vector analysis and geometric proofs.

Joffan
Messages
473
Reaction score
13
I was looking at a homework question posted here requiring proof that the vectors from the vertices of a triangle to the midpoint of the opposite edge sum to zero, and it struck me that there is a more general property:

Consider a set of points, [itex]\{A_0, A_1, \ldots A_n\}[/itex]. The midpoint of ##A_k## and ##A_{k+1}## is denoted by ##a_k##, with ##a_n## as the midpoint of ##A_n## and ##A_0##.

Now form a set of ##n## vectors defined by [itex]\stackrel{\rightarrow}{A_ra_s}[/itex] such that each vertex and each midpoint is used once by a vector in the set.

Now that set of vectors will sum to zero.

--------------------------

Sketch of messy proof
First step - the midpoints are a distraction. ##\stackrel{\rightarrow}{A_ra_s} = \stackrel{\rightarrow}{A_rA_s} + \stackrel{\rightarrow}{A_sa_s} = \stackrel{\rightarrow}{A_rA_s }+ \frac{1}2\stackrel{\rightarrow}{A_sA_{s+1}}##, so the vector sum contains a scaled loop from the midpoint steps which sums to zero.

Next step - The remaining vectors form a set of closed loops which also sum to zero.

Improvements on this welcome...
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The set of points A_k and a_k may be considered vectors from origon. So the n vectors you describe are on the form a_s-A_r, where s and r ranges from 0 to n with r depending on s via some bijection (<-- I assume this is what you mean).

a_k may be written as [itex]\frac{1}{2}(A_k+A_{k+1})[/itex], where indices are considered modulo n+1.

By writing out entire the sum, we get exactly 0.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Nice and neat. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K