Sum of random variables and Fourier transform

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 3K views
jostpuur
Messages
2,112
Reaction score
19
If [itex]X_1[/itex] and [itex]X_2[/itex] are independent random variables in [itex]\mathbb{R}^n[/itex], and [itex]\rho_{X_1}[/itex] and [itex]\rho_{X_2}[/itex] are their probability densities, then let [itex]\rho_{X_1+X_2}[/itex] be the probability density of the random variable [itex]X_1+X_2[/itex]. Is it true that

[tex] \hat{\rho}_{X_1+X_2}(\xi) = \hat{\rho}_{X_1}(\xi)\hat{\rho}_{X_2}(\xi),[/tex]

when [itex]\hat{\rho}[/itex] is the Fourier transform

[tex] \hat{\rho}(\xi) = \int\limits_{\mathbb{R}^n} \rho(x)e^{-2\pi ix\cdot\xi} d^nx?[/tex]

I believe it is true, but am unable to prove it when [itex]n>1[/itex]. If [itex]n=1[/itex], then I can show that

[tex] \rho_{X_1+X_2}(x) = \int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty}\rho_{X_1}(x-y)\rho_{X_2}(y) dy.[/tex]

This follows from a suitable variable change:

[tex] P(0\leq X_1+X_2\leq a) = \int\limits_{0\leq x_1+x_2\leq a} dx_1\; dx_2\; \rho_{X_1}(x_1)\rho_{X_2}(x_2)<br /> = \int\limits_0^a\Big(\int\limits_{-\infty}^{\infty} \rho_{X_1}(x-y)\rho_{X_2}(y) dy\Big) dx[/tex]

The result [itex]\hat{\rho}_{X_1+X_2} = \hat{\rho}_{X_1}\hat{\rho}_{X_2}[/itex] is then an easy result about convolutions and Fourier transforms.

If [itex]n>1[/itex], then a similar approach would start from the probability

[tex] P(X_1+X_2\in [0,a_1]\times\cdots\times [0,a_n]) = \int\limits_{\mathbb{R}^n} \Big( \int\limits_{-x_1 + [0,a]^n} \rho_{X_1}(x_1) \rho_{X_2}(x_2) d^nx_2\Big)d^nx_1[/tex]

but now I'm not sure what kind of variable change would work.
 
Physics news on Phys.org