MHB Sum or difference formula (sin, cos, and tan)

Taryn1
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
So I'm supposed to find the exact values of the sine, cosine, and tangent of an angle by using a sum or difference formula ( i.e. sin(x+y)=sin(x)cos(y)+cos(x)sin(y) ), but this is the angle I was given: ${-13\pi}/{12}$. How do I use a sum or difference formula to get the sin, cos, and tan of that?
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I would first add $2\pi$ to get:

$$-\frac{13}{12}\pi+2\pi=\frac{11}{12}\pi$$

And then write:

$$\frac{11}{12}\pi=\frac{1}{2}\pi+\frac{1}{4}\pi+\frac{1}{6}\pi$$

Now you can use the angle-sum formulas. :)
 
MarkFL said:
I would first add $2\pi$ to get:

$$-\frac{13}{12}\pi+2\pi=\frac{11}{12}\pi$$

And then write:

$$\frac{11}{12}\pi=\frac{1}{2}\pi+\frac{1}{4}\pi+\frac{1}{6}\pi$$

Now you can use the angle-sum formulas. :)

Or even just $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{3\pi}{4} + \frac{\pi}{6} \end{align*}$ or $\displaystyle \begin{align*} \frac{\pi}{4} + \frac{2\pi}{3} \end{align*}$ to avoid multiple uses of the compound angle formulae...
 
Thanks for your help! That makes more sense now.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top