Sum Over a Field: Algebra, Group, Ring

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter joebohr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Sum
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of summing and integrating over algebraic structures such as fields, groups, and rings. Participants explore the definitions and implications of these operations in the context of abstract algebra and analysis.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant recalls a suggestion about summing over a field other than the integers and questions how this could be done.
  • Another participant states that to take integrals, a measure must be defined on the group, ring, or field.
  • A participant proposes a formula for the integral involving a measure μ and asks for clarification on its general expression.
  • Links to the concept of Haar measure are provided as examples for defining integrals over groups.
  • There is a repeated inquiry about how to find a sum over a field, group, or ring, emphasizing the need for weights assigned to each member.
  • A participant questions the feasibility of summing the expression Ʃ 1/x over the rational numbers between 1 and 3, suggesting that the infinite nature of rationals complicates the problem.
  • Another participant argues that since integers are countable, Haar measure cannot be applied to the problem, indicating that measures must be assigned to each point for the sum to be defined.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of summing over fields or groups, particularly regarding the rational numbers. There is no consensus on how to approach the sum or integral in these contexts, and multiple competing ideas are presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to the infinite nature of certain sets and the necessity of defining measures for proper summation or integration. The discussion reflects varying assumptions about the structures involved and the methods applicable to them.

joebohr
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
I remember encountering an instance when someone suggested that you could sum over a field other than the integers. I don't remember the exact topic, but I know someone here said it. How would one sum over a field, group, or ring? For that matter, how would you take an integral over a field, group, or ring (I don't mean field as in scalar or vector field, but rather in the sense of abstract algebra).

I wasn't sure whether to put this in the abstract algebra or analysis thread, but decided on analysis.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To take integrals you need to define a measure on the group, ring, or field.
 
So if I define a measure μ on M, then would the integral be defined as [itex]\int[/itex][itex]_{μ}f(x)dx[/itex]=[itex]\sum[/itex][itex]^{\infty}_{i=1}[/itex]μ(A[itex]_{i}[/itex])f(x) where M=[itex]\bigcup[/itex][itex]^{\infty}_{k=1}[/itex]A[itex]_{k}[/itex]? Or would it look like something different? How would I express this integral generally for a measure μ?
 
Last edited:
mathman said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haar_measure

Above is one example of how it could be done.

Ok, that's a great example for an integral, but how would you find the sum over a field/group/ring?
 
joebohr said:
Ok, that's a great example for an integral, but how would you find the sum over a field/group/ring?

I am not sure what you are looking for. For a sum you need to have weights assigned to each member of the group, ring, or field. It really doesn't matter whether or not there is an algebraic structure, only weights for each element.
 
So it's impossible to solve a problem such as:

Sum the following expression over the field of rational numbers

Ʃ 1/x

where the sum over x ranges over all of the rational numbers between 1 and 3?

If this won't work with rationals because they are infinite, can someone come up with a structure in which this sum is possible (besides the usual ring of integers, of course).

Also, if this problem were an integral over the rationals instead of a sum, how would I use Haar measures to evaluate it? I looked at the wikipedia article but it doesn't seem to be very clear.
 
Last edited:
Since the integers are countable, your problem can't be done using Haar measure, since every number would have the same measure.

To do anything at all you would need to assign measures to each point. Your sum would look like: Ʃ m(x)/x, where m(x) is the measure of the point x.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K