Sum (sin(Pi*n)/(-1+n^2) , n=1infinity). n=1,2,3

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter GerardEncina
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on evaluating the infinite sum Sum (sin(Pi*n)/(-1+n^2), n=1..infinity), which is derived from solving the damped wave equation u_tt + u_t - u_xx = 0. The user reports that using Maple, the sum evaluates to -1/2*Pi. The discussion highlights the application of L'Hôpital's rule to resolve the indeterminate form that arises when n=1, where sin(Pi*n) equals zero. The conclusion confirms the correctness of the Maple output.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Partial Differential Equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with Fourier Series expansions
  • Knowledge of L'Hôpital's rule for evaluating limits
  • Experience with Maple software for mathematical computations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of L'Hôpital's rule in calculus
  • Explore Fourier Series and their role in solving PDEs
  • Learn advanced features of Maple for symbolic computation
  • Investigate the properties of damped wave equations in mathematical physics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students focused on solving partial differential equations and those interested in the applications of Fourier Series in mathematical analysis.

GerardEncina
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody!

Solving a PDE for the damped wave equation I get with a solutions that part of it have the expression:

Sum (sin(Pi*n)/(-1+n^2) , n=1..infinity). n=1,2,3...

When calculating it with Maple I get this is equal to -1/2*Pi.

Can someone of you explain me why?

Thanks a lot!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GerardEncina said:
Hi everybody!

Solving a PDE for the damped wave equation I get with a solutions that part of it have the expression:

Sum (sin(Pi*n)/(-1+n^2) , n=1..infinity). n=1,2,3...

When calculating it with Maple I get this is equal to -1/2*Pi.

Can someone of you explain me why?

Thanks a lot!

Did you get that expression from a Fourier Series expansion? Sometimes these sums arise by simply evaluating the FS at some point.
 
Yes, I'm trying to solve the PDE for the damped wave equations defined like:

u_tt+u_t-u_xx=0,

With Initial Conditions: u(x,0)=0 , u_t (x,0)=sin⁡(x)
And Boundary Conditions u(0,t)=u(Pi,t)=0

Finally I end with the solution u(x,t)=∑(n=1 to ∞) [exp^(-t/2)*(-4sin⁡(Pi*n))*sin⁡(sqrt(4n^2-1)*t/2)*sin(nx) / (Pi*sqrt(4n^2-1)*(-1+n^2))]

From here, there is the expression sin(Pi*n)/(-1+n^2), that for n=1 is 0. But solving it with Maple it gives u(x,t)=2/(3*sqrt(3))*exp^(-t/2)*sin(sqrt(3)*t/2)*sin(x).

I've also found that limit [when n-->1] of sin(Pi*n)/(-1+n^2) = -Pi/2; that plugged on the series give what Maple says.

But I'm still not sure if it is correct or not

Thanks!
 
GerardEncina said:
Yes, I'm trying to solve the PDE for the damped wave equations defined like:

u_tt+u_t-u_xx=0,

With Initial Conditions: u(x,0)=0 , u_t (x,0)=sin⁡(x)
And Boundary Conditions u(0,t)=u(Pi,t)=0

Finally I end with the solution u(x,t)=∑(n=1 to ∞) [exp^(-t/2)*(-4sin⁡(Pi*n))*sin⁡(sqrt(4n^2-1)*t/2)*sin(nx) / (Pi*sqrt(4n^2-1)*(-1+n^2))]

From here, there is the expression sin(Pi*n)/(-1+n^2), that for n=1 is 0. But solving it with Maple it gives u(x,t)=2/(3*sqrt(3))*exp^(-t/2)*sin(sqrt(3)*t/2)*sin(x).

I've also found that limit [when n-->1] of sin(Pi*n)/(-1+n^2) = -Pi/2; that plugged on the series give what Maple says.

But I'm still not sure if it is correct or not

Thanks!

\sin(n\pi) is zero for any integer n. So, all of your terms except for the first one is zero. The first is treated as non-zero because the denominator vanishes at n = 1. So, you use L'Hopital's rule to evaluate it instead.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K