Summation differentiation geometric series

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the sum of the series \(\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} kx^{k}\), which relates to geometric series and differentiation techniques. The context includes the manipulation of series and the application of calculus to derive a solution.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the differentiation of the geometric series sum and its implications for the series in question. There are attempts to relate the series to known forms and to adjust indices appropriately. Questions arise regarding the treatment of terms and whether the index change affects the outcome.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, suggesting differentiation as a method to progress. There is a recognition of the need to adjust the series for proper summation, and some guidance has been offered regarding the manipulation of terms. Multiple interpretations of the series setup are being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the implications of changing indices and the specific form of the series being differentiated. Participants are also considering the constraints of the series convergence based on the value of \(x\).

Somefantastik
Messages
226
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


find the sum for

[tex]\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} kx^{k}[/tex]

Homework Equations



[tex]\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} x^{k} = \frac{1}{1-x}; -1 < x < 1[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



[tex]\sum_{k=1}^{\infty} kx^{k} = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}(n+1)x^{n+1} = x\sum_{n=0}^{\infty} (n+1)x^{n} = x \frac{d}{dx} \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}x^{n+1}[/tex]

I'm not sure how to proceed; thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think from here

[tex]\sum_{k=0}^{\infty} x^{k} = \frac{1}{1-x}[/tex]


You should just differentiate both sides w.r.t. x and then change the index.
 
does it matter that it's xn+1 and not xn?
 
Hi Somefantastik! :smile:

(ooh, you just changed it! :biggrin:)

That's fine … now you need to get that ∑xn+1 to be part of a ∑xn starting at 0 (so you may need to subtract something :wink:).
 
How about

[tex]x \frac{d}{dx} \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}x^{n+1} = x \frac{d}{dx}\left[x\left(\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}x^{n}\right)\right] = x \frac{d}{dx}\left[x\frac{1}{1-x}\right][/tex]
 
Yes, that's fine also. :smile:

( x/(1-x) = 1/(1-x) - 1 )

(though in the form 1/(1-x) - 1, it's easier to differentiate! :wink:)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K