Summing Up Series with Arccos Functions: Finding A(2010) and B(2010)

  • Thread starter Thread starter utkarshakash
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Series
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on evaluating the series defined by A(n) = ∑_{r=1}^n arccos(r/n) and B(n) = ∑_{r=0}^{n-1} arccos(r/n) for n=2010. Key conclusions include that A(2010) is less than 2010, while B(2010) is greater than 2010, confirming multiple options as correct. The participants emphasize the use of Riemann sums to approach the evaluation of these series, suggesting that direct evaluation is impractical and that integral approximation is a more effective method.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of arccosine functions and their properties
  • Familiarity with Riemann sums and their applications
  • Basic knowledge of limits and series convergence
  • Experience with integral calculus and approximation techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Riemann sums and their relationship to definite integrals
  • Explore the properties and applications of the arccosine function
  • Learn about series convergence and divergence criteria
  • Investigate numerical methods for approximating integrals
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and researchers interested in series evaluation, integral calculus, and the properties of trigonometric functions.

utkarshakash
Gold Member
Messages
852
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement


Let An = [itex]\sum_{r=1}^n arccos \frac{r}{n}[/itex] and Bn=[itex]\sum_{r=0}^{n-1} arccos \frac{r}{n}[/itex] for n=1,2,3... then

A)A(2010) < 2010 and B(2010)>2010
B)A(2010) > 2010 and B(2010)<2010
C)A(n) < B(n) for all n
D)[itex]\lim_{n \to \infty} \dfrac{A_n}{n} = 1[/itex]

More than one option is correct.

The Attempt at a Solution



Finding A(2010) seems really challenging. I start by writing out all the terms manually.

arccos(1/2010)+arccos(2/2010)+arccos(3/2010)+arccos(4/2010)+... ..arccos(2010/2010)

Atmost I can only simplify the last term to 0. But what about the rest of the terms? The formula arccosx + arccosy = arccos{xy − √[(1 − x2)(1 − y2)]} doesn't help. It only makes the terms more complicated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For A and B there is no way they expect you to evaluate that series directly - it's going to come from a more general statement like A(n) < n for all n, or A(n) > n for all n.

As far as how to do that I recommend thinking about these series as Riemann sums (modulo a little algebra) if you have covered that.
 
Office_Shredder said:
For A and B there is no way they expect you to evaluate that series directly - it's going to come from a more general statement like A(n) < n for all n, or A(n) > n for all n.

As far as how to do that I recommend thinking about these series as Riemann sums (modulo a little algebra) if you have covered that.

So this is basically an integral where subintervals are of unit length and the function is arccos(x) and that instead of finding the sum I should find the integral. Is this what you mean?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K