Super conductor/insulator question.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mighty_quinn
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the theoretical implications and limitations of using superconductors and super insulators in capacitors. Participants explore various scenarios involving charge storage, energy limits, and the nature of energy interactions within these materials, touching on concepts from both theoretical and experimental physics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Rob questions whether a superconductor encased in a super insulator could be filled to its limits and what would happen to excess energy.
  • Bob distinguishes between superconductors and supercapacitors, mentioning the risks of quenching in superconducting magnets and the potential for melting if not discharged quickly.
  • Some participants speculate about the relationship between the discussed phenomena and the creation of X-rays, though this is met with skepticism and clarification regarding the actual mechanisms of X-ray production.
  • One participant suggests that the original question may imply a different understanding of "super insulator," possibly envisioning a scenario where energy could lead to significant physical changes, such as bending space or introducing new dimensions.
  • Another participant argues against the utility of superconductors in this context and critiques the definition of "super insulator," emphasizing that vacuum is the best electrical insulator and discussing the breakdown limits of materials under high energy densities.
  • Concerns are raised about practical issues at high voltages, including various electrical phenomena that could arise, such as surface conduction and secondary electron emission.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no clear consensus on the implications of using superconductors and super insulators in capacitors. There are competing interpretations of the original question and differing opinions on the definitions and practicalities of the materials discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the ambiguity surrounding the term "super insulator" and the theoretical nature of the discussion, noting that practical limitations and definitions are not fully resolved. The conversation also touches on the complexities of energy interactions in high-voltage scenarios.

Mighty_quinn
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey all, I have a question that I'm asking on behalf of a friend.

It is with regards to capacitors. If you had a super conductor incased in a super insulator, could you fill it to the limits of the insulation, and if there is a limit to how much charge can it can take, would the excess energy be expelled into something other then electrical discharge?

The super conductor could be solid, liquid, plasma, or just a vacuum filled with electrons encased in a super insulator, what would be the governing limit, the material or the insulator, rate of charge can be either fast or slow dependent on stopping energy being lost via heat and vibration

cheers,
Rob
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Superconductors are very different than supercapacitors. Superconductor wire is usually wrapped in an overlapping layer of Mylar (or Kapton). Superconductors in the form of large magnets (like MRI machines), can store large amounts of energy as inductive current: E = 1/2 LI2. Sometimes a high-field superconducting magnet will "quench", meaning that a small section of the superconducting wire has gone normal. And if the magnet is not fully dicharged in a very short time, the superconductor wire will melt.
Bob S
 
Just a guess, but think this is simular to how x-rays are created.
 
seb7 said:
Just a guess, but think this is simular to how x-rays are created.
If you are referring to the quench of the superconducting conductor at the CERN LHC last year, it created lots of smoke, sparks, and a 14-month delay in its startup, but very few x-rays.
Bob S
 
seb7 said:
Just a guess, but think this is simular to how x-rays are created.

Nope. This is how X-rays are generally created in lab equipment (like medical and dental X-ray machines):

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-ray_machine

wikipedia said:
X-ray photons are produced by an electron beam striking a target. The electrons that make up the beam are emitted from a heated cathode filament.
 
It sounded to me as if the questioner intended to ask a different question than the one being addressed here.
It sounded to me as though s/he may have meant a super insulator which would never, under any circumstances, conduct electricity at all. I wonder if they had in mind a change in the nature of the energy penned up "behind" the insulator. I wonder whether they may have hoped that if the energy stored in the capacitance were sufficiently large, space itself may become bent, or a new dimension may rotate into our world, or something like that.
Such ideas as these have become very popular among a certain set, especially since the news a couple of years ago that the theories of Heim are to be tested in the laboratory. (see the entry for Burkhard Heim in Wikipedia).
Although I feel that this may be what the questioner intended to ask, I am certain that there are many better-qualified people than myself to answer this question on this forum.
 
1) throw away the superconductor, it is useless.

2) Super insulator is badly defined this word is normally used for thermal insulation

The best electrical insulator that exists would be vacuum, although you can build more effective capacitors with a good dielectric, you can drive vacuum devices at higher voltages. The charge can then be extremely high.
And now we are getting theoretical. I am sure that even perfect vacuum will break down at some point when the energy density is high enough to form particle anti particle pairs. But I guess long before that happens, your material metal or whatever it is cannot hold its electrons anymore. At the latest when the energy per cubic Angstrom surpasses the ionization energy for an atom. And long before that happens you have already reached the strength limit. Capacitor plates attract the more charge you put onto them. Every material will bend and break at some point.
But to get closer to reality, at extremely high voltages you get creeping charges, surface conduction, photo effect, secondary electron emission, coronas, sharp edge emission and garbageloads of other problems.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
879
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
936
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K