How are elements produced in stars after iron?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ajayguhan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elements
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Elements heavier than iron, such as cobalt, gold, and silver, are produced in stars during the core collapse phase, where fusion occurs under extreme conditions. As the core collapses and rebounds, temperatures and pressures rise sufficiently to enable the fusion of heavier elements, despite this process being endothermic and requiring energy input. Neutron capture processes, including the s-process, contribute to the formation of these elements, with beta decay facilitating the conversion of neutrons into protons. Spectral lines of technetium in certain stars provide evidence of this nucleosynthesis occurring post-iron formation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of stellar nucleosynthesis
  • Familiarity with core-collapse supernova mechanisms
  • Knowledge of neutron capture processes, specifically the s-process
  • Basic principles of nuclear physics, including binding energy
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanisms of core-collapse supernovae
  • Study the s-process and its role in nucleosynthesis
  • Explore the properties and significance of technetium in stellar evolution
  • Investigate the role of neutrinos in nuclear reactions during supernova events
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students of nuclear physics interested in the processes of element formation in stars and the implications for cosmic chemistry.

ajayguhan
Messages
153
Reaction score
1
we know that elements are formed in the core of stars where fusion occurs.

The stars collapse on the formation of iron, if it so how come element after iron like cobalt, gold, silver were produced...?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
As the core collapses, the outer layers of the star fall as well. Once the core reaches sufficient density for neutron-neutron repulsion to hold it up, it stops collapsing and the outer layers of the star rebound off of the surface. During this rebound, the temperature, pressure, and density reach a level high enough to cause fusion to occur, building up elements higher than iron/nickel. Note that this fusion process does NOT release energy. Instead it takes energy, as the heavier elements have less binding energy per nucleon than either iron or nickel.

There is also a large burst of neutrons released, some of which are then captured by the nuclei. Beta decay can then turn some of the neutrons into protons and result in an element with more protons than it had before.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova_nucleosynthesis
 
  • Like
Likes 2 people
Technically, the process of synthesizing elements heavier than iron/nickel is endothermic, as opposed to exothermic, meaning less energy is released than absorbed. You are, however, correct in noting this extra energy is mainly supplied by the shock wave in a core detonation event. Neutrinos contribute to this process in ways not yet fully understood.
 
Drakkith said:
During this rebound, the temperature, pressure, and density reach a level high enough to cause fusion to occur, building up elements higher than iron/nickel.

A number of stars have spectral lines of technetium. Technetium is heavier than iron, and is short lived (up to 4 million years) so it could not have been in the stars before, nor have these stars exploded yet.
 
snorkack said:
A number of stars have spectral lines of technetium. Technetium is heavier than iron, and is short lived (up to 4 million years) so it could not have been in the stars before, nor have these stars exploded yet.

There is also the s-process, known as slow neutron capture, that takes place in stars. Neutrons produced in the star are captured, building up heavier isotopes of elements until they reach the point that beta decay turns them into the next element by converting a neutron into a proton. Also, see the following link for a paper about the production of technetium.

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v337/n6209/pdf/337718a0.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MoM-z14 Any photon with energy above 24.6 eV is going to ionize any atom. K, L X-rays would certainly ionize atoms. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/whats-the-most-distant-galaxy/ The James Webb Space Telescope has found the most distant galaxy ever seen, at the dawn of the cosmos. Again. https://www.skyatnightmagazine.com/news/webb-mom-z14 A Cosmic Miracle: A Remarkably Luminous Galaxy at zspec = 14.44 Confirmed with JWST...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 109 ·
4
Replies
109
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K