Superconducting Tunnel Junctions

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Rubens
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Superconducting
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the detection of terahertz radiation using superconducting tunnel junctions (SIS devices), specifically those made from Niobium, which has an energy gap (Eg) of approximately 3 meV. To effectively detect 0.7 THz electromagnetic waves, the tunneling of Cooper pairs across the insulator is essential. The conversation also highlights the necessity of applying a magnetic field to suppress supercurrent tunneling, which can interfere with measurements. Additionally, the coupling of wave functions in SIS devices leads to phase differences that generate current upon photon excitation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of superconducting materials, specifically Niobium and its energy gap properties.
  • Knowledge of Superconductor-Insulator-Superconductor (SIS) junctions and their operational principles.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of Cooper pairs and their role in superconductivity.
  • Basic principles of electromagnetic radiation and its interaction with superconductors.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of superconducting tunnel junctions and their applications in terahertz detection.
  • Study the effects of magnetic fields on superconductivity, particularly in SIS junctions.
  • Explore the role of phase coherence in superconducting systems and its impact on tunneling phenomena.
  • Investigate the design and functionality of devices like SQUIDs and their sensitivity to magnetic fields.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physicists, electrical engineers, and researchers involved in superconductivity, radiation detection, and the development of advanced electronic devices utilizing superconducting materials.

Rubens
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Just want to confirm if my understanding is correct regarding the detection method of terahertz radiation using superconducting tunnel junctions (a Superconductor-Insulator-Superconductor device). For a Niobium superconductor material (having Eg = 3meV corresponding to about 0.7 THz frequency from E=hv, where v is the frequency) all I need is about 0.7 THz of electromagnetic wave to incident on this superconducting tunnel junction detector in order for the electrons (Cooper pairs breaking up) to tunnel through the insulator and into the other superconductor. Is my understanding correct?

Please help!

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rubens said:
Just want to confirm if my understanding is correct regarding the detection method of terahertz radiation using superconducting tunnel junctions (a Superconductor-Insulator-Superconductor device). For a Niobium superconductor material (having Eg = 3meV corresponding to about 0.7 THz frequency from E=hv, where v is the frequency) all I need is about 0.7 THz of electromagnetic wave to incident on this superconducting tunnel junction detector in order for the electrons (Cooper pairs breaking up) to tunnel through the insulator and into the other superconductor. Is my understanding correct?

Please help!

Thank you!

I haven't done work on radiation detection, but here's what I remember.

First of all, Nb energy gap is about 1.3 - 1.5 meV. If you do a superconducting-insulator-normal metal (SIN) junction, this is the minimum energy that you would need to start seeing current across your junction, because this is the energy you need to break a cooper pair. However, in a SIS junction, although 1.5 meV is enough to break the cooper pair, the cooper pair has no states to tunnel to on the other side of the junction because it will be tunneling right into the gap on the other superconducting side. So you need to double the energy, and that's why the tunneling gap is around 3.0 meV.

I not sure if you still need to apply a minimal potential across the junction to help with the current, but in many cases, you need to apply a small amount of magnetic field to the junction (well below Hc) to suppress supercurrent tunneling. This current has nothing to do with the presence of the radiation, so you don't want that to overwhelm your measurement.

Zz.
 
Zz, thank you so much. Yup, I've read in an article that a magnetic field was applied to the device to suppress the supercurrent (dc Josephson effect).

One more thing, for a SIS device having a very thin insulator (approx. 10 Angstrom), the wave functions of the superconductors are coupled together right? So their wavefunctions and thus phase are the same. So any photon excitation onto the SIS device will alter the wavefunction of one of the superoconductors, resulting to a phase difference, thus, by de Broglie relation, there will be momentum (velocity) of electrons. Resulting to a current that will tunnel through the junction. Is my understanding correct?

It's really hard to do self-studying.

Thanks!
 
Last edited:
By the way, I don't know why the magnetic field can suppress the supercurrent? Is it just the typical magnetic force to deflect the movement of the charges?

Thanks again.
 
Rubens said:
By the way, I don't know why the magnetic field can suppress the supercurrent? Is it just the typical magnetic force to deflect the movement of the charges?

Thanks again.

The magnetic field adds just enough disruption to destroy the phase coherence of the supercurrent across the tunneling junction.

In SIN tunneling, what is tunneling across is the "electron", not the pair. The magnetic field doesn't destroy the electron in terms of its ability to tunnel through, at least not for low fields. In SIS tunneling, both electrons in the pair must maintain coherence with each other while they're tunneling across. The magnetic field, even a weak one, is enough to cause a slight "mis-step" during this dance.

This, btw, is why a device such as a SQUID is so sensitive to magnetic fields. Even one single magnetic quantum flux across a SQUID loop can cause a slight phase shift in the supercurrent and be detected.

Zz.
 
Ah! now I understand. Thanks so much Zz.

Rubens.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K