Superconductors and Fermi surfaces

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the nature of the Fermi surface in superconductors, particularly in the context of d-wave superconductors and BCS theory. Participants explore the relationship between the normal-state Fermi surface and the characteristics of superconducting states, including the behavior of Bogolyubov quasiparticles.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the dispersion relation for Bogolyubov quasiparticles in a d-wave superconductor and questions whether the Fermi surface of the normal state also applies to the superconductor.
  • Another participant asserts that superconducting states, such as BCS, do not have Fermi surfaces, suggesting a fundamental difference in their structure compared to normal states.
  • A third participant expresses confusion regarding the absence of a Fermi surface in the BCS state, noting that electrons at the Fermi surface become unstable and form Cooper pairs at low temperatures.
  • A later reply clarifies that the Fermi surface in an interacting system is defined by a discontinuity in the electron occupation number, which changes in superconductors. It explains that in s-wave superconductors, the quasiparticle energies do not touch zero, leading to a smearing of the original Fermi surface, although some refer to the surface of minimum gap as the "Fermi surface."

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the existence and definition of the Fermi surface in superconductors, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain unresolved.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of defining the Fermi surface in superconducting states, particularly in relation to the normal state and the effects of interactions on electron occupation numbers.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi

The dispersion of Bogolyubov quasiparticles in a d-wave superconductor is

[tex] <br /> E(\mathbf k) = \pm \sqrt{\varepsilon (\mathbf k)^2+\Delta (\mathbf k)^2},[/tex]

where ε(k) is the normal-state dispersion and ∆(k) is the gap dispersion. My question is: The Fermi surface (FS) of the normal state is just ε(k). Is this also the FS of the superconductor?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Superconducting states (i.e. BCS) are not Fermi balls, and so don't have Fermi surfaces.
 
Thanks for replying. I don't quite understand; at low temperatures, the electrons at the FS become unstable, and join in Cooper pairs to reduce energy. Then how can the BCS state not have a FS?

Again, thanks. I really appreciate it.
 
Hi Niles,

The Fermi surface in an interacting system may be defined in terms of a discontinuity in the electron occupation number [tex]n_k[/tex] in momentum space. For free electrons this discontinuity is one while for interacting electrons in a Fermi liquid this discontinuity is less than one. In an s-wave superconductor there is no longer this discontinuity because the qausiparticle energies no longer touch zero i.e. [tex]E_k = \epsilon_k - \mu[/tex] is replaced by [tex]E_k = \pm \sqrt{(\epsilon_k - \mu)^2 + \Delta^2}[/tex]. The original Fermi surface is smeared on the energy scale of [tex]\Delta[/tex]. However, sometimes people refer to the surface of minimum gap in momentum space as the "Fermi surface," and this surface tracks the original Fermi surface in many cases, but they are strictly speaking different concepts.

Hope this helps.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
7K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K