Superconductors usable as propulsion devices?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the feasibility of using superconductors for propulsion by suggesting that a mass could tunnel through a superconductor, potentially allowing for faster-than-light travel. However, it is established that particles do not tunnel through realistic materials in the manner proposed. The concept of tunneling as applied to superconductors has been verified in specific contexts, such as tunneling spectroscopy of High Tc superconductors, but the suggested application lacks empirical support. Therefore, the idea of using superconductors for propulsion in this way is not scientifically valid.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum tunneling phenomena
  • Knowledge of superconductivity and its principles
  • Familiarity with High Temperature Superconductors (High Tc)
  • Basic principles of momentum and reaction forces in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research quantum tunneling and its applications in superconductors
  • Study the principles of superconductivity, focusing on High Tc superconductors
  • Explore experimental evidence of tunneling effects in various materials
  • Investigate the limitations of faster-than-light travel concepts in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and engineers interested in superconductivity, quantum mechanics, and advanced propulsion technologies.

ocalhoun
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
If I were able to get a particle with mass to tunnel through a superconductor (for the sake of having a point, a long, thin, cylindrical one), would that mass's travel through the superconductor have the same equal-but-opposite-reaction effect as the same mass if it were accelerated to such speed by other means? I realize that the particle would return to it's original speed when it left the superconductor, but would it effect the momentum of whatever the superconductor was mounted on while going through the superconductor?

I (perhaps mistakenly) understand that particles (usually electrons) travel through superconductors instantly, the speed of light non-withstanding.

If both of the above mentioned things are true, then this would be a way to propel a vessel faster than the speed of light, yes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ocalhoun said:
If I were able to get a particle with mass to tunnel through a superconductor (for the sake of having a point, a long, thin, cylindrical one), would that mass's travel through the superconductor have the same equal-but-opposite-reaction effect as the same mass if it were accelerated to such speed by other means? I realize that the particle would return to it's original speed when it left the superconductor, but would it effect the momentum of whatever the superconductor was mounted on while going through the superconductor?

I (perhaps mistakenly) understand that particles (usually electrons) travel through superconductors instantly, the speed of light non-withstanding.

If both of the above mentioned things are true, then this would be a way to propel a vessel faster than the speed of light, yes?

No, it isn't.

Have you seen any particle that can tunnel through a realistic, physical material? Try shooting a beam of electrons through a material. Do you see any "tunneling effect"?

You cannot use a phenomenon to do something if that phenomenon hasn't been demonstrated to be true. You are applying the physics of tunneling, but not in ways in which we know it to work. I posted about a week ago on here a review of tunneling spectroscopy of High Tc superconductors. This type of phenomenon has been verified. The one you're suggesting, has not!

Zz.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
5K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
5K