Superluminal instantaneous influence

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter scope
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Superluminal
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of superluminal instantaneous influence in quantum entanglement, specifically questioning whether such influence occurs before measurement as well as after. Participants clarify that the term "influence" should be replaced with "correlation," emphasizing the distinction between correlation and causation. The conversation highlights that correlation and expectation values pertain to ensembles rather than individual measurements. For deeper understanding, it is recommended to refer to "Ballentine," which provides comprehensive insights into these quantum mechanics concepts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum entanglement
  • Familiarity with correlation vs. causation in physics
  • Knowledge of measurement theory in quantum mechanics
  • Basic concepts of expectation values in quantum systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Read "Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development" by Leslie E. Ballentine
  • Explore the EPR paradox and its implications in quantum theory
  • Study the differences between correlation and causation in quantum mechanics
  • Investigate the role of measurement in quantum entanglement
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and anyone interested in the foundational concepts of quantum entanglement and measurement theory.

scope
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
hi,

it is well known that after measurement, there is a superluminal instantaneous influence (but not really communication) in entanglement.

I wonder if such influence also happens everytime before measurement as well?

i would be very grateful to read your reply!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


scope said:
it is well known that after measurement, there is a superluminal instantaneous influence
(but not really communication) in entanglement.

It's not "influence" (which is another term for "causation"), but rather correlation.

Correlation and causation are very distinct concepts.
 


anyway, the question is: does the same happen both before and after measurement?
 


scope said:
anyway, the question is: does the same happen both before and after measurement?

One can't correlate the results of measurements before those measurements
have been performed, i.e., before the results exist.
 


ok, and what if, before the measurement, the state of the first particle is modified. would the state of the second particle in entanglement be modified to verify again the correlations?. in other words, does the EPR effect applies even without measurement?
 


scope said:
ok, and what if, before the measurement, the state of the first particle is modified. would the state of the second particle in entanglement be modified to verify again the correlations? in other words, does the EPR effect applies even without measurement?

Correlation, expectation values, etc, etc, are concepts that apply to an ensemble.
But you're trying to think of them in the context of a single instance of an experiment.

I don't think there's much more I can usefully say here in a few lines except "invest
in a copy of Ballentine". He discusses all this stuff much better and more comprehensively
than I could ever do here.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K