Superluminal transfer of information via gravity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of superluminal transfer of information via gravity, particularly in the context of whether the gravitational influence of the sun could be detected faster than the speed of light. Participants explore the implications of gravity's propagation speed and its effects on Earth’s motion and celestial observations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that if the sun were to blink out of existence, the gravitational effects would also take time to reach Earth, suggesting that gravity travels at the speed of light.
  • Another participant questions the practicality of detecting the Earth's deviation from its expected path due to the sun's absence, arguing that it would not be noticeable within the 8-minute timeframe.
  • Concerns are raised about the ability to measure small shifts in star positions or the effects on communications satellites, with some arguing that such changes would be undetectable.
  • A participant suggests that if we cannot accurately predict the Earth's orbit, it would reflect poorly on scientific progress and implies that experiments could be designed to test the speed of gravity.
  • Counterarguments are presented regarding the feasibility of detecting a 700-meter shift in position, emphasizing the limitations of current observational capabilities and the challenges of achieving high precision in measurements.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the detectability of gravitational changes and the implications for scientific understanding. There is no consensus on whether the speed of gravity can be experimentally validated or the significance of the potential observations.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the limitations of current astronomical measurements and the challenges associated with detecting small positional changes in celestial bodies. The discussion also highlights the dependence on definitions of measurement accuracy and the assumptions underlying the arguments presented.

crapola77
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
it takes light about 8 minutes to reach Earth from the sun, and I've heard it said information cannot be transmitted faster than the speed of light. if the sun blinked out of existence, steady stream of light indicating to you the the sun still exists would last for 8 minutes, but could you not tell the sun was gone almost instantly by the loss of gravity from the sun?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The gravitational field also has to travel at the speed of light. The gravity you feel now from the sun is pulling you towards where it was 8 minutes ago.
 
jdog has given you the 'popular' reply, but it has not been proven to my knowledge, however, I don't think we would know it even in 8 minutes. Why would we? The Earth would start to move straight instead of in an ellipse. How would we know that?
 
star positions, communications satellites breakdowns
 
crapola77 said:
star positions, communications satellites breakdowns
In 8 minutes the Earth would be less than 700 meters out of place. Do you really think we could detect that small an error in the star positions in less than 8 minutes? I don't.

Communications satellites would be fine too.
 
Last edited:
if one were looking for it yes, it would be a sad indication of mans scientific achevment of we couldn't considering star positions have been one of the strongest underlying themes in all of science reaching as far back the first humans, if we can't predict with a high degree of accuracy the path of the Earth's orbit and when its no longer obeying laws by which we predict its orbit then I suggest the hope for the discovery of a fundamental theory of the universe is far beyond our scope, and moreover and more importantly one could design experiments to test for the speed of gravity, the real issue, which I am inclined to believe they have. Does anyone know of experimental evidence one way or the other?
 
crapola77 said:
if one were looking for it yes, it would be a sad indication of mans scientific achevment of we couldn't considering star positions have been one of the strongest underlying themes in all of science reaching as far back the first humans, if we can't predict with a high degree of accuracy the path of the Earth's orbit and when its no longer obeying laws by which we predict its orbit then I suggest the hope for the discovery of a fundamental theory of the universe is far beyond our scope...
Huh? That's just a big load of crapola. The largest stellar parallax we can see is about 3/4 of an arcsec over the course of a year. We certainly wouldn't be able to detect it to as we moved out of position 700m! (That would imply we could measure it on a minute-to-minute basis, as the Earth rotates fast enough for a 700m shift in a minute at moderate latitude.

Perhaps you are confusing this concept with celestial navigation, for which we could probably with high quality instruments and a stationary platform get closer than 700m, but it wouldn't be easy. That kind of accuracy on a ship, on a regular basis, would be nearly impossible.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
10K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K