Superposed photon hitting a polarizing beamsplitter

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jelrod45
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Photon
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the behavior of superposed photons when interacting with a polarizing beamsplitter. A photon with a superposition state of <1,1>/√2 has a 50% probability of being transmitted and a 50% probability of being reflected. The interaction with the beamsplitter does not collapse the superposition until a measurement is made, allowing for the possibility of self-interference, similar to the double slit experiment. This phenomenon is linked to the quantum Mach-Zehnder interferometer, which is crucial for understanding optical computing.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles, specifically superposition and measurement.
  • Familiarity with the behavior of photons and polarization states.
  • Knowledge of polarizing beamsplitters and their function in optical systems.
  • Basic concepts of quantum interference, particularly in the context of the Mach-Zehnder interferometer.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of quantum superposition and measurement in quantum mechanics.
  • Study the operation and applications of polarizing beamsplitters in optical systems.
  • Explore the Mach-Zehnder interferometer and its significance in quantum optics.
  • Investigate the implications of quantum interference for optical computing technologies.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, optical engineers, quantum computing researchers, and anyone interested in the principles of quantum mechanics and their applications in technology.

jelrod45
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone,

This is my first post, but I have been here a lot looking up things for homework problems in some math and science courses. I love the community here, so here I am! I am a computer science major, and know a bit about physics, but my expertise is in software engineering, so please excuse any incorrect assumptions / elementary mistakes I may have made/thought. I have a wonderful idea, and have asked professors/colleagues and have not been able to find a definite answer. So I am turning here.

Dealing with polarity of photons, take horizontal polarity to be <1,0> and vertical polarity to be <0,1> (looking at the photon moving straight at/away from you).

Say you have a polarizing beamsplitter, which to my understanding will transmit one polarization of a photon and reflect the opposing polarization. Given this definition of a polarizing beamsplitter, it seems like what would logically happen if a photon with polarity <1,1>/√2 were to hit a polarizing beamsplitter, the photon would have 1/2 chance of being transmitted and 1/2 chance of being reflected.

If this is correct, then it also seems like this case would be analogous to the famous double slit experiment. Would it be correct to interpret the activity of the photon as being both transmitted and reflected until measured after the beamsplitter? More explicitly, would the activity of the beamsplitter collapse the superposition of the polarity of the photon immediately, or would subsequent activity applied to the photon not be "applied" until a measurement decides whether the photon is transmitted or reflected.

I am considering writing a paper on optical computing that is dependent on such activity, and definitely need to know the ins and outs of all of this before choosing this as my topic.

I will be glad to clarify any ambiguities in the question and am looking forward to hearing what you all think!

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi, Welcome to PF :)

jelrod45 said:
Would it be correct to interpret the activity of the photon as being both transmitted and reflected until measured after the beamsplitter?
Yup, in fact the photon can be made to interfere with itself!
3402008727_618b1fca26.jpg

This is the quantum version of the Mach-Zehner inferometer.
 
That is excellent! I thought that this would be the case, but a few people in one of my classes weren't sure about it, so I needed to get a more qualified opinion. This is super exciting. Thank you for your answer!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
4K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K