Superposition & Mixture : Preparation and Representation of

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the preparation and representation of superpositions and mixtures, particularly using Gaussian wavefunctions in non-overlapping regions. It highlights a misconception that mixtures cannot be represented by wavefunctions, illustrating that introducing orthogonal states allows for a mixed state representation. The importance of this concept is emphasized in the context of symmetry breaking, where different symmetry (sub)spaces become orthogonal. The participants seek clarification on the specific states that would represent the example discussed in the article. Overall, the conversation delves into the nuances of quantum state representation and its implications in theoretical physics.
Swamp Thing
Insights Author
Messages
1,045
Reaction score
775
I have been reading this explanation about superpositions and mixtures. The author takes the example of two non-overlapping regions in space, each covered by a gaussian wavefunction. He goes on to compare the superposition and the mixture made up of those two gaussian functions, based on their different representations in terms of their density matrices.

My question is, how would one actually prepare a mixture exactly like the example discussed there?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The article states that a mixture cannot be represented by a wavefunction. This isn't completely correct. E.g. introducing additional states ##|+\rangle## and ##|-\rangle##, which are supposed to be orthogonal, you can write the mixed state as ## p_1|\psi_1\rangle |+\rangle+p_2 |\psi_2\rangle |-\rangle##.
This is especially important in symmetry breaking, where (sub)spaces with different symmetry become orthogonal.
 
What would ##|+\rangle## and ##|-\rangle## be in the example that he talks about?
 
Just two states from an auxillary space.
 
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 69 ·
3
Replies
69
Views
8K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
8K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K