Supplement to Jackson (also, 2nd vs 3rd Ed.)

  • Thread starter Thread starter HJ Farnsworth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Jackson
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the challenges of using the textbook "Classical Electrodynamics" by Jackson, particularly regarding its derivations that often skip crucial steps. Users recommend supplementary resources such as "Classical E&M" by Franklin and "Modern Electrodynamics" by Zangwill, which provide more detailed explanations. The consensus favors the 3rd edition of Jackson for its improved content, despite its use of SI and Gaussian units, while the 2nd edition is noted for its better formatting. Users advise sticking to the unit system used in lectures to avoid confusion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of classical electromagnetism concepts
  • Familiarity with derivations in physics textbooks
  • Knowledge of unit systems: SI, Gaussian, and Heaviside-Lorentz
  • Experience with theoretical physics and field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Classical E&M" by Franklin for detailed derivations
  • Explore "Modern Electrodynamics" by Zangwill for alternative explanations
  • Study the differences between SI and Gaussian units in electromagnetism
  • Investigate the Heaviside-Lorentz unit system for theoretical applications
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of classical electromagnetism and improve their textbook study strategies.

HJ Farnsworth
Messages
126
Reaction score
1
I am about to start using Jackson E&M, and I have consistently heard that it is a notoriously difficult textbook to use. Does anyone know of some good resources, textbooks or otherwise, to supplement it (other than Griffiths, which I already have)?

More specifically, I have been told that the derivations frequently skip steps, or tell the reader that a missing step should be obvious, with maddening phrases such as, "we see that...". This is very unfortunate - the way that I prefer to use textbooks is to follow the derivations that they offer in detail (it often even frustrates me when a derivation is only given as a solution to a problem, i.e., the reader has to supply it. When this is done too much, it just interrupts the flow of the text). In fact, I usually don't even feel comfortable using an equation unless I have seen and understand its derivation.

So, when I say "supplement" above, what I am really looking for is something to the effect of a textbook or online pdf entitled, "The missing steps in Jackson's derivations".

However, any additional resources would be very much appreciated.

On a related topic, if people have opinions regarding the merits of the 2nd versus the 3rd edition of Jackson, I would be curious to hear them, since I haven't decided which to buy yet.

Thanks very much for any help that you can give.

-HJ Farnsworth
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's one of the best textbooks ever written. The 3rd edition has the only disadvantage that Jackson uses SI units and then switches to Gaussian units when he treats the relativistic formulation. In my opinion in theoretical physics the best system of units are Gaussian or rationalized Gaussian (Heaviside-Lorentz) units, and electrdynamics is a inherently relativistic theory, the paradigmatic example of a relativistic field theory, but that's a quite unique opinion nowadays since nearly all newer textbooks on electromagnetism use the SI nowadays :-(.

On the other hand the 3rd edition is somewhat better concerning the chapter on radiation reaction on classical point particles.
 
Hi, thank you very much for the replies.

As far as 2nd versus 3rd, then, it sounds like 3rd edition is a little better for content, and 2nd is better for format. I'll probably go for the 3rd edition then. If the units annoy me too much while I'm using it, or I feel like I'm developing some bad habits, I'll just get the 2nd edition as well.

Classical E&M by Franklin looks great, thanks for the advice!
 
Well, concerning the units, you should stick to the ones used in your lecture. Otherwise it's too confusing in the beginning. Nowadays most classical-electromagnetism lectures use the SI and then switch to Gaussian units when they treat the relativistic ("true") formulation, because then the SI is too inconvenient. In high-energy elementary-particle/nuclear physics, where one deals with quantum field theory the theoreticians use a third variant, namely the rationalized Gaussian units, where the factors of 4 \pi appear at the place where they should (e.g., Coulomb's Law for the field of a point charge) and not in the Maxwell equations. These units are also called Heaviside-Lorentz units. So far I've not found a textbook on classical electromagnetism that uses this system of units, which in my opinion is the most convenient set of units for theoretical purposes. I'd not recommend to buy two editions of the same book. For Jackson I'd go with the newest (3rd) edition.
 
Excellent, I will check that one out too.

Thanks for the advice!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
34K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K