gjonesy
- 264
- 182
I like someone to tell me how I can even apply for this wonderful affordable heath care coverage that the ACA promised me 8 years ago?
The Supreme Court upheld the Affordable Care Act (ACA) with a 6-3 decision, affirming its constitutionality and ensuring the continuation of health care subsidies. This ruling is pivotal as it sets the stage for the upcoming elections, where the future of the ACA may hinge on the political landscape. The discussion highlights the ongoing debate about the ACA's effectiveness compared to other health care systems, particularly in Canada, where long wait times have led some Canadians to seek treatment in the U.S. The conversation also touches on the implications of ACA's mandates and taxation, clarifying that while individuals can be taxed for not having health insurance, they cannot be criminally penalized.
PREREQUISITESPolicy analysts, health care professionals, political scientists, and anyone interested in understanding the implications of the ACA and the ongoing health care debate in the United States.
https://www.healthcare.gov/gjonesy said:I like someone to tell me how I can even apply for this wonderful affordable heath care coverage that the ACA promised me 8 years ago?
Hornbein said:Wendell Potter was a senior VP at a major health insurer (most recently doing $30B in business).
gjonesy said:I do, it was promoted as national heath care on Obamas first campaign for the presidency.
http://www.cnn.com/ELECTION/2008/issues/issues.healthcare.html
DEMOCRATS
Barack Obama![]()
Would create a national health insurance program for individuals who do not have employer-provided health care and who do not qualify for other existing federal programs
Hornbein said:Wendell Potter was a senior VP at a major health insurer (most recently doing $30B in business). According to him the insurance sector loves Obamacare.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wendell_Potter
On September 15, 2009, Potter appeared before the United States House of Representatives Democratic Steering and Policy Committee. Potter said in his opening statement that if Congress "fails to create a public insurance option to compete with private insurers, the bill it sends to the president might as well be called the Insurance Industry Profit Protection and Enhancement Act."[8]
gjonesy said:Notice the words insurance and health care are interchangeable terms in the context in which they were used here.
jim hardy said:I'd love a law that forced people to tithe to me, too.
(Well actually i wouldn't. That's thievery.)
House Republicans won Round 2 in a potentially historic lawsuit Thursday when a federal judge declared the Obama administration was unconstitutionally spending money to subsidize health insurers without obtaining an appropriation from Congress.