Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the relationship between the supremum of a function \( f(x) \) over the interval \([a,b]\) and the supremum of the function \( f(x+c) \) over the interval \([a+c,b+c]\). Participants explore whether these two supremums are equal and the implications of a potential typo in the original question.
Discussion Character
- Mathematical reasoning
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant initially proposes that \( \alpha = \sup_{x\in [a,b]} f(x) \) should equal \( \sup_{x\in [a+c,b+c]} f(x+c) \).
- Another participant challenges this assertion, providing a counterexample with specific values for \( a, b, c, \) and \( f(x) \).
- Subsequent posts clarify that the original question contained a typo, suggesting it should be \( \sup_{x\in [a,b]} f(x) = \sup_{x\in [a+c,b+c]} f(x-c) \).
- One participant suggests proving the equality of two sets derived from the function values over the specified intervals to establish the relationship between the supremums.
- Another participant expresses gratitude for the responses but indicates a misunderstanding due to internet issues, reiterating their request for suggestions.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on the original claim regarding the supremums. There is disagreement about the validity of the initial assertion, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct relationship between the supremums.
Contextual Notes
The discussion includes a potential typo that affects the interpretation of the problem, leading to confusion among participants. The assumption that the supremum exists is also noted but not resolved.