Surface charge distribution of two metal spheres

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the charge distribution and tension in a wire connecting two metal spheres with a total charge Q. The charge on each sphere is derived using the equation Q1 = Q / (1 + R2/R1), assuming the potential is uniform across the conductors. The tension in the wire is expressed as Tension = Q1 * Q2 / (4πε0(L + R1 + R2)²), emphasizing that the length L must be sufficiently large to neglect interaction energy between the spheres.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electrostatics, specifically charge distribution in conductors.
  • Familiarity with the concept of electric potential and its uniformity in conductors.
  • Knowledge of Coulomb's law and its application in calculating forces between charges.
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills to derive equations from physical principles.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of electrostatics in more depth, focusing on conductors and charge distribution.
  • Learn about the implications of electric potential in connected conductors.
  • Explore the derivation and applications of Coulomb's law in various configurations.
  • Investigate the effects of wire length on the interaction between charged conductors.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, educators, and anyone interested in electrostatics, particularly in understanding charge distribution and forces in conductive materials.

jdstokes
Messages
520
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



A total charge Q is shared by two metal spheres of small radii R1 and R2, that are connected by a long thin wire of length L. Fin (a) the charge on each sphre and (b) the tension in the wire.

Source: Haliday 4th edn chapter 26 q. 91, p. 738

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm a bit confused by this. I assume that since the potential must be uniform for a conductor, that we can make the equation

\frac{rQ}{4\pi\epsilon_0 R_1} = \frac{(1-r)Q}{4\pi\epsilon_0 R_2}

from which we obtain

Q_1 = \frac{Q}{1 + R_2/R_1}.

But I suppose this is only valid if the length of L is sufficiently large that we can ignore the interaction energy of the two spheres right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps I am correct, and merely

\mathrm{Tension} = \frac{Q_1 Q_2}{4\pi \epsilon_0 (L + R_1 +R_2)^2}?
 
You're correct for both parts.

However, they probably want tension in terms of the given parameter Q, not in terms of Q1 and Q2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K