Surface density of stars in a Galaxy

Click For Summary
The scale length of a galaxy's disk is defined as the distance over which the surface density of stars decreases by a factor of e. In this discussion, the surface density decreases by a factor of 10 over 9 kpc, leading to a calculated scale length of 9 kpc. The formula for surface density is σ(r) = σ0e−r/h, where σ0 is the central surface density and h is the scale length. A participant questions the assumption that e equals 10, indicating a potential misunderstanding of mathematical constants. The conversation highlights the importance of accurately interpreting the relationship between surface density and scale length in galactic structures.
Barbequeman
Messages
7
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
The surface density of stars in a galaxy at a radius of 1 kpc from the centre is 100 Msun/pc^2. The surface density at 10 kpc is 10 Msun/pc^2. Assuming that the surface density of stars is given by the exponential law, calculate
(a) The scale length of the disk.
(b) The surface density at the centre of the galaxy.
Relevant Equations
σ(r) = σ0e−r/h
a.)
The scale length of the disk is the length over which the surface density of stars decreases by a factor of e. In this case, the surface density decreases by a factor of 10 over a distance of 9 kpc, so the scale length is 9 kpc. The surface density of stars at a radius of r from the center of the disk is given by: σ(r) = σ0e−r/h where σ0 is the central surface density and h is the scale length of the disk. We can rearrange this equation to solve for h: h = −r/ln(σ(r)/σ0) plugging in the values from the question, we get: h = −9 kpc/ln(10/100)
h = 9 kpc
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Barbequeman said:
The scale length of the disk is the length over which the surface density of stars decreases by a factor of e. In this case, the surface density decreases by a factor of 10 over a distance of 9 kpc, so the scale length is 9 kpc.
Ummm, back up a second. So you are saying that ##e = 10##?
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 63 ·
3
Replies
63
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K