Surface Forces-Some Clarification Needed

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Caveman11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Surface
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the nature of van der Waals forces, specifically addressing the London dispersion force, which is not always attractive and can exhibit repulsive characteristics at higher orders, particularly when considering the Axilrod–Teller potential. The Casimir effect is also mentioned as a related phenomenon. Additionally, the repulsive forces experienced at short distances when an SPM tip approaches a sample surface are attributed to the Pauli exclusion principle and the electrostatic repulsion of outer electrons.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of van der Waals forces, including Debye, Keesom, and London forces
  • Familiarity with the Lennard-Jones potential
  • Knowledge of quantum mechanics, particularly the Pauli exclusion principle
  • Basic concepts of electrostatics and atomic structure
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Axilrod–Teller potential and its implications in three-body interactions
  • Explore the Casimir effect and its applications in quantum physics
  • Study the Lennard-Jones potential in detail, focusing on its repulsive and attractive components
  • Investigate the role of quantum mechanics in intermolecular forces
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those focusing on intermolecular forces, quantum mechanics, and surface science, will benefit from this discussion.

Caveman11
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I'm currently doing some reading into surface forces and am confused about the following:

-Are the van der Waals forces (Debye,Keesom and London) always attractive? I thought they were until I read that the London force is not always.

-When approaching a surface for example say with an SPM tip and a sample surface the potential that is experienced is given by the Lennard-Jones potential. However at very short distances the force becomes repulsive. Is this due to the Pauli exclusion principle and electrostatic repulsion of the atom's outer electrons?

Any answers you have are greatly appreciated.

Nick
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Caveman11 said:
-Are the van der Waals forces (Debye,Keesom and London) always attractive? I thought they were until I read that the London force is not always.

Only the London force, and only to higher orders (Axilrod–Teller potential) with three-body effects. (Same goes for the Casimir effect, which is essentially the same phenomenon)

The other two are, more or less by definition, described by classical electrostatics, whereas the London dispersion force is a purely (nonrelativistic) quantum effect.

Is this due to the Pauli exclusion principle and electrostatic repulsion of the atom's outer electrons?

Both.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K