Surface Forces-Some Clarification Needed

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Caveman11
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Surface
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
Caveman11
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I'm currently doing some reading into surface forces and am confused about the following:

-Are the van der Waals forces (Debye,Keesom and London) always attractive? I thought they were until I read that the London force is not always.

-When approaching a surface for example say with an SPM tip and a sample surface the potential that is experienced is given by the Lennard-Jones potential. However at very short distances the force becomes repulsive. Is this due to the Pauli exclusion principle and electrostatic repulsion of the atom's outer electrons?

Any answers you have are greatly appreciated.

Nick
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Caveman11 said:
-Are the van der Waals forces (Debye,Keesom and London) always attractive? I thought they were until I read that the London force is not always.

Only the London force, and only to higher orders (Axilrod–Teller potential) with three-body effects. (Same goes for the Casimir effect, which is essentially the same phenomenon)

The other two are, more or less by definition, described by classical electrostatics, whereas the London dispersion force is a purely (nonrelativistic) quantum effect.

Is this due to the Pauli exclusion principle and electrostatic repulsion of the atom's outer electrons?

Both.