Surface parametrization and its differential

In summary, the conversation discusses the parametrization of a surface given by the intersection of a plane and an infinite cylinder. The parametrization is done using vector notation and the normal vector is calculated using the cross product. The speaker also raises a question about the differential of a parametrized surface and why it is not enough to just use the modulus of the cross product. The answer given is that the modulus of the tangent vectors indicates how far the parameters change and is proportional to the area obtained by a certain parameter change.
  • #1
jonjacson
453
38
I will use an example:

-The surface is given by the intersection of the plane:

y+z=2

-And the infinite cilinder:

x2+y2<=1

We want to parametrize this surface, it could be done easily with:

x=r cosθ
y=r sin θ
z=2 - r cos θ

Then this surface could be written using vector notation:

S= r cosθ i + r sin θ j + (2 - r sin θ)k

I understand that these are a set of vectors starting from the origin and ending at the surface, so nothing has changed here, it is just a compact form of the same surface.

Then the normal vector is calculated first finding the tangent vectors on r and θ and then taking the cross product and multiplying this by dr dθ.

What I don't understand is, if I simply differenciate S, Why don't I get the same dS?

I will show what I mean.
1.- Using the first method:

Sr =(cos θ, sin θ,-sin θ)
Sθ =(-sinθ r, r cosθ, -r cos θ)

After doing the cross product I get:

Sr x Sθ
= r j + r k

This vector is normal to the surface, and it must be multiplied by dr dθ.

2.- WHat if I simply differenciate S? Shouldn't I get the same result as in part 1?

The differential of the vectors i, j, k is zero because they don't change.

We had S= r cosθ i + r sin θ j + (2 - r sin θ)k, so:

dS= (dr cos θ - sin θ dθ r) i + ...

I don't need to continue since the i part is not zero, but in the previous calculation it was zero. What is wrong with the normal process of differenciation? Shouldn't it give us a differential of surface?
I thought the differential of a parametrized surface is just the differential of its components but I don't know what to think now.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
jonjacson said:
I will use an example:

-The surface is given by the intersection of the plane:

y+z=2

-And the infinite cilinder:

x2+y2=1

We want to parametrize this surface, it could be done easily with:

x=r cosθ
y=r sin θ
z=2 - r cos θ

This is not describing a surface. It is the intersection between two two-dimensional surfaces in three dimensions - which is typically a one-dimensional object.
 
  • #3
Orodruin said:
This is not describing a surface. It is the intersection between two two-dimensional surfaces in three dimensions - which is typically a one-dimensional object.

Maybe I didn't explain it well.

The cilinder is solid, is not empty, so the intersection is a kind of inclined circle.
 
  • #4
I add a question.

If we have an area in the plane, the differential of this area is simply ds * dt, if there is a parametrized surface that arises from this plane area to form a 2d manifold in 3d space, the surface corresponding to ds * dt is:

Modulus (Tangent vector to s x Tangent vector to t) * ds * dt

Where x is the cross product.

What I don't understand is, Why is it not enough with the modulus of the cross product? Why do we multiply by ds and dt?

If I calculate the tangent vectors at a point and I calculate the cross product I get an area right?
 
  • #5
In other words, Why tangent vectors are not divided by their own modulus so their modulus becomes 1?
 
  • #6
jonjacson said:
In other words, Why tangent vectors are not divided by their own modulus so their modulus becomes 1?

Because the modulus of the tangent vectors tell you how far you move when the parameters change and the area you get by a certain parameter change is proportional to how far the parameter change takes you.

It is the same reason that you get
$$
d\vec x = \frac{d\vec x}{dt} dt
$$
in a line integral.
 
  • #7
Orodruin said:
Because the modulus of the tangent vectors tell you how far you move when the parameters change and the area you get by a certain parameter change is proportional to how far the parameter change takes you.

It is the same reason that you get
$$
d\vec x = \frac{d\vec x}{dt} dt
$$
in a line integral.
I understand, the tangent vectors are the rate of change, multiplied by a dx you get a dy.

Thanks
 

FAQ: Surface parametrization and its differential

1. What is surface parametrization?

Surface parametrization is a mathematical method used to represent a surface in three-dimensional space using a set of parameters. This allows for the surface to be described and manipulated using equations and calculus.

2. Why is surface parametrization important?

Surface parametrization is important because it allows for the analysis and manipulation of complex surfaces in a simpler and more organized manner. It also enables the application of differential geometry and calculus to study and understand the properties of surfaces.

3. What is the differential of a surface parametrization?

The differential of a surface parametrization is a linear transformation that describes the rate of change of the surface with respect to the parameters used to describe it. It is used to calculate important quantities such as surface area and curvature.

4. How is surface parametrization used in computer graphics?

Surface parametrization is used in computer graphics to create smooth and realistic surfaces in 3D models. By representing surfaces using parameters, they can be easily manipulated and rendered on a computer.

5. Can surface parametrization be applied to any type of surface?

Yes, surface parametrization can be applied to any type of surface, including flat, curved, and even non-orientable surfaces. However, the choice of parametrization may vary depending on the specific properties and characteristics of the surface being studied.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top