Question about vector calculus

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 replies · 2K views
Another
Messages
104
Reaction score
5
particles in plane polar coordinates

r = rcosθ i + rsinθ k

F = Fer + F

r/∂r =|∂r/∂r|er = (cos2θ + sin2θ)½er = er

why
r/∂θ =|∂r/∂θ| = (r2cos2θ + r2sin2θ)½ = r

I understand that ∂r/∂θ = -rsinθ + rcosθ but why r/∂θ = (r2cos2θ + r2sin2θ)½
 
on Phys.org
Please use LaTeX for typing formulae. Then everything gets much better readable!

Let's start from scratch. As you correctly write in terms of polar coordinates you have
$$\vec{r}=r \cos \theta \vec{i}+r \sin \theta \vec{j}.$$
If you have a parametrization of the position vector with some generalized parameters like here ##r## and ##\theta##, you can define a new basis at every point in the vector space by using the tangent vectors to the coordinate lines as any point. They are given by the partial derivatives with respect to the parameters:
$$\vec{b}_r=\partial_r \vec{r}=\cos \theta \vec{i} + \sin \theta \vec{j}, \quad \vec{b}_{\theta}=\partial_{\theta} \vec{r}=-r \sin \theta \vec{i} + r \cos \theta \vec{j}.$$
Now you realize that you have a particularly nice case of parameters here, namely socalled "curvilinear orthogonal coordinates", which means that the basis vectors are perpendicular to each other. Indeed, as you can easily check by direct calculation, using ##\vec{i} \cdot \vec{i}=\vec{j} \cdot \vec{j}=1## and ##\vec{i} \cdot \vec{j}=0##,
$$\vec{b}_r \cdot \vec{b}_{\theta}=0.$$
In such cases, it is convenient to use normalized basis vectors. So let's calculate the lengths of the basis vectors
$$g_r^2=\vec{b}_r \cdot \vec{b}_r=1, \quad g_{\theta}^2=\vec{b}_{\theta} \cdot \vec{b}_{\theta}=r^2.$$
Thus you can introduce orthonormal vectors by just normlizing these (socalled holonomous) basis vectors,
$$\vec{e}_r=\frac{1}{g_r} \vec{b}_r=\vec{b}_r, \quad \vec{e}_{\theta} = \frac{1}{g_{\theta}} \vec{b}_{\theta}=\frac{1}{r} \vec{b}_{\theta}.$$
Thus you indeed find
$$\frac{\partial \vec{r}}{\partial r}=\vec{e}_r, \quad \frac{\partial \vec{r}}{\partial \theta}=r \vec{e}_{\theta}.$$
The advantage to use the normalized orthogonal basis vectors instead of the holonomous ones is also easy to understand. You can very easily calculate the coordinates of any vector ##\vec{V}## with respect to the orthonormal basis,
$$V_r=\vec{e}_r \cdot \vec{V}, \quad V_{\theta}=\vec{e}_{\theta} \cdot \vec{V}.$$
It's easy to show that indeed
$$\vec{V}=V_r \vec{e}_r + V_{\theta} \vec{e}_{\theta}$$
by expressing everything again in Cartesian coordinates and the corresponding basis vectors ##\vec{i}## and ##\vec{j}##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jedishrfu