Surprising sound frequency from a bottle

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Pereskia
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frequency Sound
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the sound frequencies produced by striking glass bottles partially filled with water. Participants explore the relationship between water levels and sound frequency, considering various physical principles and resonant behaviors. The scope includes experimental observations, theoretical implications, and potential models of sound propagation in the glass and water.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that as water level increases in the cylindrical part of the bottle, the frequency of the sound produced decreases, indicating a possible relationship between water level and sound frequency.
  • Others propose that the water may act as a damper affecting the frequency of the glass vibrations rather than being the primary source of resonance.
  • A participant questions how the water stabilizes the glass and its role in facilitating standing waves, prompting further investigation into the nature of the sound produced.
  • There is a discussion about the influence of water on the oscillation of the glass and how it may increase the oscillation period due to added inertia.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about how the water affects the sound in the glass, particularly regarding the base frequency of the note produced.
  • One participant mentions the possibility of vibration modes belonging to the glass wall rather than the air inside the bottle, comparing it to the modes of a church bell.
  • Another participant suggests that the pupils could explore exciting waves in the air inside the bottle as a simpler theoretical approach.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various hypotheses and uncertainties regarding the role of water in sound production, with no consensus reached on the primary mechanisms at play. Multiple competing views remain about the influence of water on sound frequency and the nature of standing waves.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of calculating vibration modes in the glass and the challenges associated with understanding sound reflection at the water's surface. The discussion highlights the experimental nature of the pupils' project and the exploratory learning involved.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to educators, students involved in experimental physics, and individuals curious about sound propagation and resonance in materials.

Pereskia
Messages
15
Reaction score
2
Two of my pupils in secondary high school is doing a project on the sound generated by striking glass bottles drumsticks.

They fill the bottle partially with water and strike the bottle with a drumstick and record the sound.

Preliminary results:
As long as the water level is in the cylindrical part of the bottle the frequency gets lower with more water. (Rules out Helmholtz and standing wave in the air above)
Filling water over the cylindrical part does not change frequency any more.
The frequency does not depend on where the bottle is hit. The resonance seems however better if the bottle is stuck below water level.

Any ideas what the resonator is. Is there a standing wave in the water? Or is the water causing a standing wave in the glass below the water level?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Dale
Physics news on Phys.org
Pereskia said:
... strike the bottle with a drumstick ...Or is the water causing a standing wave in the glass below the water level?
You are hitting the glass, so why blame the water for the glass vibration? The water could act as a damper that affects the frequency.
 
Yes, one idea is that the water stabilizes the glass and make a standing wave in the glass possible. But in that case, how does the water do that? Why does the water affect the standing wave in the glass? The pupils will try see if the frequencies match that of a standing wave and what speed that standing wave has in that case.
 
Pereskia said:
Yes, one idea is that the water stabilizes the glass and make a standing wave in the glass possible.
Why do you think the standing wave in the glass is not possible without the water? What happens if the bottle is empty? What is the frequency range of your analysis?
 
There is of course a sound from the empty bottle as well. There has to be some influence from the water on the standing wave and since the frequency falls with rising water level I guess that the standing wave is mainly in the part of the glass that is below water level. What I can't understand is how the water affect the sound in the glass.
 
Pereskia said:
What I can't understand is how the water affect the sound in the glass.
When the glass oscillates and changes shape, the water must as well. The additional inertia from the water increases the oscillation period. The water also filters the high frequencies that pass though it, which affects the sound propagating inside the bottle.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: nasu and Pereskia
Not exactly the same situation, but this video might be helpful:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pereskia
I can see how the filtering is happening but I can't see how that could affect the base frequency of the note.

The pupils have measured the base frequency for a number of water levels and will try to calculate the wave speed that a standing wave (from the bottom up to the water surface) would have in the glass and see if it matches the speed of sound in glass. They will have to do this in at least two different ways since we do not know how the sound reflects at the top. Maybe this can shed some light on if this is what's going on.
 
Thank you. There is a possibility of vibration in "the cup way" also, then maybe the water acts somewhat as a mass in a spring (or a handle of a cup). It could be harder to make the calculations to see if this is the case but it seems lika a resonable possibility as well.
 
  • #10
The vibration modes belong to the glass wall not to the space inside the glass bottle. Unfortunately they are not so easy to calculate as for standing waves in a tube. They are similar to the modes of a church bell. Maybe you should ask them to excite waves in the air inside the bottle, by blowing air over the mouth of the bottle. These are closer to the simple theory exposed in introductory physics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Pereskia
  • #11
nasu said:
The vibration modes belong to the glass wall not to the space inside the glass bottle. Unfortunately they are not so easy to calculate as for standing waves in a tube. They are similar to the modes of a church bell. Maybe you should ask them to excite waves in the air inside the bottle, by blowing air over the mouth of the bottle. These are closer to the simple theory exposed in introductory physics.
This is the pupils' final project. They choose the subject themself and they do not need to have a final answer to pass. I more see this as an opportunity for them and me to learn as much as possible. It is not every day a pupil comes up with something that is new for me.
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K