Surviving a Difficult Coworker in the Industrial Workplace

  • Thread starter Thread starter wolram
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Job
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the challenges of working with a difficult coworker in an industrial setting, focusing on safety concerns, communication issues, and the dynamics of teamwork. Participants share personal experiences and opinions regarding workplace safety and the impact of a colleague's actions on their well-being.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses frustration with a new coworker who is perceived as incompetent and unsafe, recounting several near-miss incidents.
  • Another participant questions whether the original poster has reported the coworker's behavior to a supervisor, implying a need for more oversight.
  • Some participants discuss the nature of workplace accidents, suggesting that they are often preventable and result from a series of errors.
  • There are suggestions for improving communication and safety practices, such as verifying actions taken by coworkers and being more vigilant about potential hazards.
  • Humorous remarks are made about the situation, including sarcastic suggestions for handling the coworker, which some participants interpret as a light-hearted take on a serious issue.
  • One participant shares a personal anecdote about a past experience with scuba diving, drawing a parallel to the importance of safety in high-risk situations.
  • Another participant reflects on the importance of having skilled operators in critical roles, emphasizing the reliance on teamwork in industrial settings.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement on the importance of safety and communication, but there is no consensus on how to handle the difficult coworker or the best approach to prevent accidents. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the effectiveness of current safety practices and the responsibility of individuals in ensuring a safe work environment.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge various assumptions about workplace dynamics, the effectiveness of safety protocols, and the reliability of coworkers. There are references to specific incidents and personal experiences that highlight the complexity of the situation.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals working in industrial environments, safety professionals, and those interested in workplace dynamics and accident prevention strategies may find this discussion relevant.

wolram
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
4,411
Reaction score
551
I am fed up with my job, in the last six days i have managed to get a black eye, two electrical shocks, got my arm jamed, and all because i have a new guy to work with ,and boy can he talk the talk, this guy has worked every where and done every thing and yet he can not find the simplest fault, and i want very much to kill him, i showed him how to (jog) the machine (inch) mode, so that i could set up a cam, and the dick head puts it on full cycle, i nearly lost my arm, trying to find an electrical fault i tell him to throw breakers 12 a 13 he threw 1 and 3, if it wasnt for the rubber wellies we have to wear i would be toast now, we have to work a buddy system as the lines we work on are quite big, and often times control panels are far from the parts we are working on, i think i could snap this guys neck, but would that make me a bad person.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What kind of work do you do?

Have you told your boss that the new guy is unsafe, and needs more supervision from him?

- Warren
 
chroot said:
What kind of work do you do?

Have you told your boss that the new guy is unsafe, and needs more supervision from him?

- Warren

Hey , Warren, the world i live in is crazy, it seems i have unlimited power when it comes to keeping things running, but no power as to how i do it, if i have a major problem my bosses are otherwise engaged.
 
Send him up to fix the lines next time and you throw the wrong circuit breakers :wink: Just make sure he forgets to put his wellies on :-p

(I am joking by the way)
 
Not wanting to encourage you or anything but remember accidents happen everyday at work.
 
But there is no reason to accept that. Accidents should not happen and 99% is preventable human error.

Actually accidents are the result of a long chain of binary yes - no events, if not this..and if not that and if not that etc then the accident would not have happened. However this and this and this and this together caused it to happen. So accident prevention programs are training people to identify those chains of events and actually the accident did not happen in this case All switches were in the accident mode except for the last switch, which was in the right -safe- position: "if it wasn't for the rubber wellies".

So Wolram, it may pay sometime to be very alert recognising the chain of events leading to disaster. Think ahead, what if this went wrong or that went wrong?

If you knew that person, could or would you have checked if the correct breakers were pulled or had asked him to read back which circuit breakers he did pull. And of course the buddy system is there for buddies. Take him to the pub and have a real good talk with him.
 
wolram said:
i showed him how to (jog) the machine (inch) mode, so that i could set up a cam, and the dick head puts it on full cycle, i nearly lost my arm, trying to find an electrical fault i tell him to throw breakers 12 a 13 he threw 1 and 3

Surely you would never
- stick your hand in a machine while someone has their hand on the start button
- start working on a high power line without first dropping a wrench across it to ensure it really is dead

I hope you don't sky dive or scuba dive in your spare time. If you let others be responsiblew for your life and limb you'd be dead by now.
 
Or you could take your buddy down the pub and have an accident with him, what happened to the physicsforums where you could be sarcastic and get away without someone taking you seriously.
 
Andre said:
But there is no reason to accept that. Accidents should not happen and 99% is preventable human error.

Actually accidents are the result of a long chain of binary yes - no events, if not this..and if not that and if not that etc then the accident would not have happened. However this and this and this and this together caused it to happen. So accident prevention programs are training people to identify those chains of events and actually the accident did not happen in this case All switches were in the accident mode except for the last switch, which was in the right -safe- position: "if it wasn't for the rubber wellies".

So Wolram, it may pay sometime to be very alert recognising the chain of events leading to disaster. Think ahead, what if this went wrong or that went wrong?

If you knew that person, could or would you have checked if the correct breakers were pulled or had asked him to read back which circuit breakers he did pull. And of course the buddy system is there for buddies. Take him to the pub and have a real good talk with him.

I will give it a try, in the mean time while he is around i have to think he is doctor death and check everry thing twice, but my rep as mr fast fixer will suffer
 
  • #10
DaveC426913 said:
I hope you don't sky dive or scuba dive in your spare time.
He only tried scuba diving once, and he damned nearly drowned because his 'cute wouldn't open. I'd hate to even think what would happen if he went skydiving and his air-hose kinked up.
 
  • #11
Danger said:
He only tried scuba diving once, and he damned nearly drowned because his 'cute wouldn't open. I'd hate to even think what would happen if he went skydiving and his air-hose kinked up.

Hey, leave me alone, i am a very safe opperator when alone,it just worries me that this guy was looking at an inverter and told me , the plc says it is not energised that's the problem.
 
  • #12
I used to fish commercially.

It's always nice when the man running the hydraulics knows what he's doing. I cherished those moments.
 
  • #13
Pythagorean said:
I used to fish commercially.

It's always nice when the man running the hydraulics knows what he's doing. I cherished those moments.

Seen some film clips, you sure depend on each other in that job, the last person that you want on the hydraulics is a cross between Mr mgoo and a gremlin.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
127
Views
23K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 108 ·
4
Replies
108
Views
20K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K