Surviving the Fall: The Physics of Cliffhanger's Epic Ending

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jimmy p
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Movie Physics
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the physics of a character's potential survival in the film "Cliffhanger" during a helicopter crash scenario. Participants explore the implications of jumping from a helicopter just before impact versus remaining inside it, considering factors such as velocity, air resistance, and the nature of the crash.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the speed of the crash is crucial, noting that jumping at the last second would only reduce impact velocity by about 3 m/s.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the downward speed of the helicopter at impact means that jumping just before hitting the ground does not equate to falling a shorter distance.
  • A different viewpoint questions the assumption that staying in the helicopter would be fatal, proposing that the helicopter's design may allow it to fall slower than a human and absorb impact damage.
  • This participant argues that the helicopter's rotors could provide significant air resistance, potentially making it safer for a human inside than freefalling.
  • There is a light-hearted acknowledgment from the original poster that they may have lost the debate with their housemate regarding the survival scenario.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the likelihood of survival in both scenarios (jumping versus staying in the helicopter), indicating that multiple competing views remain without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Assumptions about the helicopter's weight, the nature of the crash, and the effects of air resistance are not fully explored, leaving some aspects of the discussion unresolved.

jimmy p
Gold Member
Messages
419
Reaction score
73
I'm not sure if a similar question has been asked before but here goes.

I was watching Cliffhanger the other night, and right at the end, the John Lithgow character plummets to his doom on top of helicopter. This sparked a discussion with my housemate as to whether he could survive the fall if he jumped off the helicopter right at the point of impact with the ground, disregarded debris and the inevitable explosion. For some reason I have it in my head that he can survive, where my housemate (probably rightly so) believes that it doesn't matter, he will die.

Who is right and why? (if that really needs to be answered)

thanks

JP
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This depends on the speed of the crash. Assuming the helicopter is heavy enough jumping at the last second will only decrease your velocity at impact by about 3 m/s (the vertical velocity you reach initialy when jumping).
 
Remember that, just before hitting the ground, you have the downward speed of the helicopter. Jumping out of the helicopter when it is a few inches off the ground is not as falling just those few inches. As DavidK said, you could only decrease your rate of fall slightly by your upward jump.
 
It also begs the question - would he be likely to survive the fall if he stayed in the helicopter? We intuit that it will kill him, but I'm not so sure. Why do we presume that a freefall of equal height might not kill him?

Consider the relative benefits of being in a helicopter:

1] A helicopter, while we think of it as a massive piece of machinery - is extremely light for its size (it's carefully built that way). This would make it an object that actually falls a fair bit slower than a human. Even mangled, the rotors still provide significant air resistance. I'll bet if you dropped a human and a helicopter from the same height, the human would hit much sooner (faster acceleration, plus higher terminal velocity). Helicopters, whle admittedly not experts at it, are still much better gliders than human bodies.

2] The helicopter would absorb the vast quantity of damage when it hit.


If one could minimize the subseqent squashing or battering inside a metal can - I would bet that a human would actually stand a much better chance of suriviving the initial impact if he were inside a helicopter than if he were freefalling.
 
:blushing: I forgot that I asked this... thanks for the answers guys, looks like I lost the debate. I'm not going to tell him though :devil:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K