SUSY and GUTs all but eliminated by latest ACME experiment

  • #1
95
41

Main Question or Discussion Point

I'm surprised no one has posted about this yet, so I guess I'll take it upon myself to post the link, even though I have no real expertise on the subject. The ACME collaboration had the results of their latest measurement of the electron's EDM published in Nature today. They place an upper limit of 9.4X10-29 e cm, an order of magnitude improvement over the previous measurement. According to the chart below, this value eliminates many BSM models. I've also included a couple of pedagogical videos from the ACME group. RIP 'naturalness'.

PW-2013-11-147-Johnston-edm-second.jpg

 

Attachments

Last edited:

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Haelfix
Science Advisor
1,950
212
The relevant constraint analysis which that chart is based on is :
https://arxiv.org/abs/1612.08090

It should be noted that the subclass of models that are being considered and ruled out are rather extreme. So significant caveats and loopholes exist in the general case for all models considered. The plots in the original paper are more indicative of the reach of this experiment. Still this experiment quite significantly constrains the relevant theory spaces for model builders.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
  • #3
Vanadium 50
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Education Advisor
2019 Award
24,343
7,197
It should be noted that the subclass of models that are being considered and ruled out are rather extreme
Which makes the title highly misleading.
 
  • Like
Likes king vitamin and dextercioby
  • #4
Buzz Bloom
Gold Member
2,146
363
I am puzzled by the upper limit value of 9.4X10-29 e cm.
Within the Standard Model of elementary particle physics, such a dipole is predicted to be non-zero but very small, at most 10−38 e·cm.

If I am understanding correctly what I am reading, the new upper limit value is 10 orders of magnitudes larger than the upper limit quoted in Wikipedia. Now I know that Wikipedia's reputation in the PF is not on a par with authoritative journals like Nature, but this extreme difference is quite puzzling.
 
  • #5
George Jones
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
7,315
869
If I am understanding correctly what I am reading, the new upper limit value is 10 orders of magnitudes larger
The above is an experimental observation

than the upper limit quoted in Wikipedia
This a standard model theoretical prediction. Some Beyond the Standard Model theories make larger predictions.
 
  • Like
Likes ohwilleke and Buzz Bloom
  • #6
95
41
I am puzzled by the upper limit value of 9.4X10-29 e cm.
Within the Standard Model of elementary particle physics, such a dipole is predicted to be non-zero but very small, at most 10−38 e·cm.

If I am understanding correctly what I am reading, the new upper limit value is 10 orders of magnitudes larger than the upper limit quoted in Wikipedia. Now I know that Wikipedia's reputation in the PF is not on a par with authoritative journals like Nature, but this extreme difference is quite puzzling.
I goofed on the upper limit: I quoted the old one--the new one is actually an order of magnitude smaller (by 'smaller' I mean that it's approximately one-tenth the value that I quoted). You can find it in the linked paper. For some reason I'm not able to edit my original post. Also, if I could, I would retitle the thread "Natural SUSY all but eliminated..." to make it more accurate.
 

Related Threads on SUSY and GUTs all but eliminated by latest ACME experiment

  • Last Post
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
1K
Top