Swinging Atwood Machine, Hamilton-Jacobi Eq.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the analysis of a swinging Atwood machine using Hamiltonian mechanics and the Hamilton-Jacobi equation (HJE). The user successfully derived the Hamiltonian, H, and the Lagrangian, L, for the system with mass ratio M=3m. The transformations for coordinates r and θ were applied, leading to the separation of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation into two solvable parts, W1(ξ) and W2(η). The user seeks clarification on the correctness of their Hamiltonian and the separation constant, as well as the purpose of the transformations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hamiltonian mechanics and the Hamilton-Jacobi equation.
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian mechanics and the derivation of conjugate momenta.
  • Knowledge of coordinate transformations in classical mechanics.
  • Basic proficiency in solving differential equations related to mechanical systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation in classical mechanics.
  • Learn about the significance of separation constants in solving differential equations.
  • Explore the implications of coordinate transformations in Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations.
  • Review advanced mechanics texts, such as "Hand and Finch," for deeper insights into complex mechanical systems.
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for undergraduate physics students, particularly those studying classical mechanics, as well as educators and researchers interested in Hamiltonian dynamics and the Hamilton-Jacobi equation.

Gregg
Messages
452
Reaction score
0
This is a question about the swinging Atwood machine. I have completed the first half of the problems which involved finding a lagrangian involving the obvious co-ordinates, finding the conjugate momenta and writing a new Hamiltonian:

[tex]H = E = \frac{p_{\theta}^2}{2mr^2}+\frac{p_r^2}{2(m+M)}-gr(m \cos \theta - M)[/tex]

We are then given the expression for the energy under the following transformations:

[tex]r = \frac{\xi^2 +\eta^2}{2}[/tex]

[tex]\theta = 2\arctan\left(\frac{\xi^2-\eta^2}{2\xi\eta}\right)[/tex]

Which is:
eq1.png


We are looking at the case where M=3m (the system is integrable) Rather than just changing a sign somewhere in E I decided to use
[tex]L=2T-E[/tex]

After plugging this in and doing some cancellations I found that:

[tex]T = 2m(\xi^2\eta^2)(\dot{\eta}^2+\dot{\xi}^2)[/tex]

[tex]L=2m(\eta^2+\xi^2)(\dot{\eta}^2+\dot{\xi}^2)-2mg \frac{\xi^4+\eta^4}{\xi^2+\eta^2}[/tex]

Now I have the Lagrangian I can find the canonically conjugate momenta for xi and eta as the partial derivatives of my Lagrangian with respect to their corresponding time derivatives. Plugging this into the equation for the Hamiltonian I get a new H:

[tex]H = \frac{p_{\eta}^2+p_{\xi}^2}{8m(\eta^2+\xi^2)}+2mg \frac{\eta^4+\xi^4}{\eta^2+\xi^2}[/tex]

Then we come to the bit I am stuck on the part about the Hamilton-Jacobi equation. I don't know if I've made a mistake somewhere but I thought the transformations were supposed to simplify the problem?

Using HJE

[tex]\frac{1}{8m(\xi^2+\eta^2)} \left[ \left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial \xi} \right)^2 + \left( \frac{\partial S}{\partial \eta} \right)^2 \right] + 2mg \frac{\eta^4 + \xi^4 }{\eta^2+\xi^2} + \frac{\partial S}{\partial t} = 0[/tex]

So they're separable so take S,

[tex]S(\eta, \xi, t) = W_1(\xi) +W_2(\eta) - Et[/tex]

where E is the energy.

Then I deduce that:

[tex]\frac{1}{8m(\xi^2+\eta^2)}\left[ \left( \frac{d W_1(\xi)}{d \xi} \right)^2 + \left( \frac{d W_2(\eta)}{d \eta} \right)^2 \right] + 2mg \frac{\eta^4 + \xi^4 }{\eta^2+\xi^2} = E[/tex]

Then because it's separable or at least we are assuming it is:

[tex]\left( \frac{d W_1(\xi)}{d \xi} \right)^2 = 8\xi^2m (E-2mg \xi^2)[/tex]
[tex]\left( \frac{d W_2(\eta)}{d \eta} \right)^2 = 8\eta^2m (E-2mg \eta^2)[/tex]

Which is solvable giving:

[tex]W_1(\xi) = -\frac{\sqrt{2} (E-2m\eta^2)^{3/2}}{2\sqrt{m}}[/tex]
[tex]W_2(\eta) = -\frac{\sqrt{2} (E-2m\xi^2)^{3/2}}{2\sqrt{m}}[/tex]

Am I wrong in splitting it up this way? The question says to separate them with separation constant I

q1.png


What is separation constant I, and have I separated properly? Is the Hamiltonian correct? I am unsure on how going from here I will eventually get an EoM. And what the point of the transformations were really.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
your a second year at durham aren't you?

this is our homework for Theoretical Physics.

I don't know - haven't looked at it.

tbh - feign illness. easiest way out.

or if you actually want to do it - get Hand and Finch out of the Library - its pretty helpful.
 
No thanks I'd rather just do it. Got the book
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K