Switching from Biology undergrad to Physics grad....

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential transition from an undergraduate background in biology to pursuing graduate studies in physics. Participants explore the feasibility of this shift, the necessary preparations, and the implications of such a change in academic focus.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a strong desire to switch to physics after realizing a passion for the subject, despite a background in biology and political science.
  • Some participants suggest combining interests in physics and medicine, proposing fields like medical engineering or biophysics as potential pathways.
  • Concerns are raised about the adequacy of the participant's physics and math background for graduate studies, with questions about specific courses taken and overall preparedness.
  • There are suggestions to consider graduate programs designed for students without a physics undergraduate degree, emphasizing the importance of addressing any academic deficiencies.
  • Some participants highlight the competitive nature of graduate programs and the potential challenges of being on equal footing with peers who have a stronger physics background.
  • Discussion includes the importance of follow-through and commitment in pursuing a physics career, with some participants questioning the participant's engagement in the discussion.
  • There are humorous remarks regarding the distinction between physicists and physicians, reflecting on the participant's career aspirations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of support and skepticism regarding the feasibility of transitioning to physics graduate studies. There is no consensus on the best course of action, as opinions vary on the participant's preparedness and the appropriateness of self-study versus formal coursework.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include uncertainties about the participant's specific coursework in physics and mathematics, as well as the varying admission criteria of different graduate programs. The discussion does not resolve whether self-study is sufficient preparation for graduate-level physics.

batman123456
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I will try to keep this concise. I have always loved physics, but was convinced by my parents to pursue biology for career in medicine. Over my undergrad, it really became clear to me that I love physics, and want to pursue a career in the field (a Master's, and then a PHD). I am currently in my fifth year of undergrad, I will graduate coming summer (in a year). I have a major in biology (and poli sci as the other major), and my degree is an HBSc (honors bachelors of science).

I thought my hopes for physics were over, but I found a few schools here in Canada (I live in Toronto) such as Toronto Metropolitan university, and York U that accept physics grad students with a background in any science degree, and if we are missing any important component for grad school, we take some "additiional relevant courses". I am going to take a year off after undergrad during which I will study physics on my own.

My question is, is this something do-able or recommended? Do I really stand a chance in grad school physics? What is the best course of action for me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could combine the two, career in medicine and physics. For instance medical engineering, nuclear medicine, radiotherapy research
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters
You could also check for graduate programs in biophysics. Don't know about Canadian universities, but in the US there are interdisciplinary programs (offered jointly by physics and biology departments). You enter with an undergrad degree in either physics or biology, and you take appropriate courses to bring you up to snuff in your non-major.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman and malawi_glenn
batman123456 said:
I thought my hopes for physics were over, but I found a few schools here in Canada (I live in Toronto) such as Toronto Metropolitan university, and York U that accept physics grad students with a background in any science degree, and if we are missing any important component for grad school, we take some "additiional relevant courses". I am going to take a year off after undergrad during which I will study physics on my own.
<<Emphasis added>> Why do that if you have access to graduate programs specifically designed to accommodate students who were not physics undergrads?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gleem, russ_watters and berkeman
Which physics courses/classes have you taken so far, beyond the freshman-level course that biology majors usually or often have to take?

Also math...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
We used to have a sticky that covered physics graduate school for non-physics majors. ZapperZ wrote it, I think. Any idea where it is?

While grad schools may take students whose preparation is deficient, that doesn't mean a) they will, b) they will support the student while the deficiencies are rectified, or c) the degree of deficiency is irrelevant to the acceptance decision. Your individual situation makes a big difference.
 
Ryerson (aka TMU) only offers MS and PhDs in Biomedical and Medical Physics so you could be potentially be eligible for that with your Biology background if those fields interest you. If you want to go more traditional Physics (AMO, HEP, Astron, Astrophys) you won't get that at Ryerson.

York's program specifically states "Graduates with an honours degree or equivalent in astronomy, physics, or engineering physics" so I don't think you would qualify for that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: malawi_glenn
  • #10
Admission issues aside...
  • Given that the majority of your graduate classmates will have not only majored in physics, but done exceedingly well in their courses, will you be on equal footing with them? Consider courses covered in physics, math, and programming. What kinds of lab courses have you taken? Are you comfortable with electronics?
  • Also by "equal footing" will you be competitive in a course that's graded on a relative scale?
  • You won't get credit for studying anything on your own.
  • Will you be able to study something on your own without the pressure of course deadlines? Without feedback from professors, how will you know if you've really understood the material?
  • If you haven't done any research, volunteered in a physics lab, or completed a senior thesis project in physics, how do you know graduate studies in physics is the right direction for you?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: malawi_glenn and berkeman
  • #11
batman123456 said:
My question is, is this something do-able or recommended? Do I really stand a chance in grad school physics? What is the best course of action for me?
It really depends on you and your background. It's certainly do-able for some people.

jtbell said:
Which physics courses/classes have you taken so far, beyond the freshman-level course that biology majors usually or often have to take?

Also math...
Most undergrad biology majors I knew avoided anything beyond the absolute minimum when it came to taking math. If that's the case with the OP, it would be, I think, the main impediment to success academically.

Once you have basic calculus, differential equations, linear algebra, and intro physics out of the way, you're supposedly ready for the junior and senior level physics courses which prepare you for physics grad school.

CrysPhys said:
<<Emphasis added>> Why do that if you have access to graduate programs specifically designed to accommodate students who were not physics undergrads?
It might make sense to remedy deficiencies that would keep the OP out of those graduate programs altogether, like not having taken enough math to be able to begin taking the remedial physics courses. I would take any math needed at a school, though, rather than relying on self-study, since the OP will need evidence that he knows the material.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mark44 and dlgoff
  • #12
What exactly does 'physics' mean to you? For if it means grandiose stuff like cosmology or QFT, bridge courses or several of those suggested above, like medical physics, etc., might come as a disappointment to you. These are more or less from the applied physics sector.
 
  • #13
Well, the OP posted his question and never came back. I think it's fair to say that follow-through is an important part of a physics major and en even more important part of a physics career, but he hasn't demonstrated it here.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD, gleem, berkeman and 2 others
  • #14
Vanadium 50 said:
Well, the OP posted his question and never came back. I think it's fair to say that follow-through is an important part of a physics major and en even more important part of a physics career, but he hasn't demonstrated it here.
Certainly won't endear him to faculty that may need to put themselves out on a limb for him given his unusual status and expectations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #15
Vanadium 50 said:
Well, the OP posted his question and never came back. I think it's fair to say that follow-through is an important part of a physics major and en even more important part of a physics career, but he hasn't demonstrated it here.
If lack of follow-through is a core shortcoming for the OP, it would be far preferable for the OP to pursue a career in physics than medicine. :wink:
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, berkeman, Vanadium 50 and 1 other person
  • #16
CrysPhys said:
career in physics than medicine.
..., or perhaps a "thinning of the herd" might be desirable for those who do NOT apply caveat emptor when shopping for physicians.
 
  • #17
Bystander said:
..., or perhaps a "thinning of the herd" might be desirable for those who do NOT apply caveat emptor when shopping for physicians.
Physics, Medicine. Is the OP confusing physicist and physician?
 
  • #18
WWGD said:
Physics, Medicine. Is the OP confusing physicist and physician?
"Physicist, heal thyself."

"The Hippocratic Theory of the Origin of the Universe"
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K