Switching polarity on electromagnets

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of electromagnets, particularly focusing on the effects of switching polarity on an electromagnet with an iron core. Participants explore concepts related to magnetic field propagation, magnetization dynamics, and the limitations of frequency in switching polarity, touching on both theoretical and practical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the magnetic alignment in an iron core propagates instantly or at the speed of light when switching the polarity of an electromagnet.
  • Another participant clarifies that while the magnetic field penetrates the material at the speed of light, the magnetization does not follow instantaneously and involves flipping magnetic domains rather than individual spins.
  • It is noted that the magnetization process can be affected by the need for a certain field strength to change the alignment of pinned domains, leading to observable effects such as Barkhausen noise.
  • Concerns are raised about frequency limitations due to eddy currents induced in metallic cores, which result in energy losses as frequency increases.
  • A participant introduces the Landau-Lifshitz-Gilbert equation in relation to the discussion, prompting further inquiry about its relevance to magnetization dynamics.
  • Another participant provides a wave equation for the magnetic field, indicating that in soft magnetic materials, the speed of magnetization waves is slow due to high permeability.
  • There is a discussion about the distinction between the magnetic fields H and B, with implications for understanding material response in ferromagnets.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the distinction between the propagation speed of the magnetic field and the dynamics of magnetization. However, there are competing views regarding the implications of the wave equation and the effects of domain behavior, leading to unresolved questions about the accuracy of certain models and equations.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the complexity of non-linear responses in ferromagnetic materials and the assumptions underlying the continuum approximation used in the wave equation. The discussion also highlights the need for clarity regarding the definitions and roles of different magnetic fields.

dorker
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
First off, hi, I'm new. Sorry if this is not the right board; I was unsure between Classical Physics, maybe Quantum since this involves fields, or Electrical Engineering.

On to the question, say you have an electromagnet with an iron core. As I understand it, a magnetic field acts on a ferromagnetic material by aligning the magnetic spin of the latter's atoms. If you were to switch the electromagnets' polarity back and forth, can I assume this magnetic alignment propagates through the core instantly (or at the speed of light would more correct, I suppose), or are there any dynamic equations for this kind of thing?

And if it is an "instantaneous" effect, is there anything limiting the frequency I can switch the polarity with, or can I go as fast I want and assume the iron can take it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The magnetic field penetrates the material at the speed of light (in the material, which may be lower than the speed of light in vacuum), but the magnetization does not follow instantaneously.

In general, you don't flip the spins one by one, but you flip little domains. These can be pinned, i.e. you need a certain field strength to change their alignment. So the magnetization proceeds in little jumps that can be measured. If you attach a pick-up coil and headphones it can even be heard. This is called Barkhausen noise.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barkhausen_effect

Another frequency limiting effect is that magnet cores tend to be metallic. A changing magnetic field therefore induces an electric current (Eddy current) in the core that leads to losses in the form of heat. The induced currents depend on the rate of change of the magnetic field, so that at higher frequency the losses are higher.

Check out the section on energy losses here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformer
 
M Quack said:
The magnetic field penetrates the material at the speed of light (in the material, which may be lower than the speed of light in vacuum), but the magnetization does not follow instantaneously.

Thanks. Is that what the Landau-Lifgarbagez-(Gilbert) equation is about?
 
M Quack said:
The magnetic field penetrates the material at the speed of light (in the material, which may be lower than the speed of light in vacuum), but the magnetization does not follow instantaneously.
[/url]
True.
The wave equation for H(x,t) is given by
\frac{\partial^2H\left(x,t \right)}{\partial x^2}-\epsilon \mu \frac{\partial^2H\left(x,t \right)}{\partial t^2} = 0
where the speed of H(x,t) is given by v=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\epsilon \mu}}. In soft magnetic materials, μ is very high, meaning that the magnetization wave is \sqrt{very} slow.
 
\sqrt{\mathrm{very}} ... I love that one.

Note that your equation is for the continuum approximation and assuming that the magnetization is proportional to the applied field. If you have domains jumping back and forth this is no longer correct - you get hysteresis and locally non-uniform magnetization.
 
Thanks to everyone for the answers, but Bob S, could you clear up a couple of things for me? First, the H in that equation is the magnetic field, right? So why do you say this means the magnetization propagates slowly?

Second, what's the source on that equation? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
The problem is that there are two "magnetic fields", H and B. Roughly speaking, H does not include the response of the material, and B does include it.

When the material response is linear one can write B = \mu \mu_0 H. This is pretty much always the case when talking about electromagnetic waves, hence the formula for the speed of light. When talking about ferromagnets the response becomes non-linear and things get more complicated.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_field

The equation is the electromagnetic wave equation, derived from Maxwell's equations.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_wave_equation
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K