Graduate Symmetries in particle physics

Click For Summary
In particle physics, symmetries are often described using groups like SO(N) and SU(N), with SU(3) used for the three colors of quarks and SU(2) for quark doublets. The choice of SU over SO is due to the need for complex rephasing in quark fields, which is not accommodated by orthogonal groups. The kinetic terms in the Lagrangian remain invariant under global SU(N) transformations, highlighting their significance. Transitioning from global to local gauge symmetry necessitates introducing minimal coupling to gauge fields. This framework is essential for accurately describing the interactions and properties of fundamental particles.
Shen712
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
We often use SO(N) and SU(N) to describe symmetries in particle physics. I am not clear which one to choose when I try to discuss a symmetry. For example, why do we use SU(3) but not SO(3) to describe the symmetry of the three colors of quarks? Similarly, why do we use SU(2) but not SO(2) to describe a quark doublet, for instance, the (u d) doublet?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The obvious answer would be ”because the orthogonal groups would not describe nature”.

On a more technical note, the quark fields allow complex rephasing and the kinetic terms in the Lagrangian are invariant under the global SU(N) transformations. Promoting the global symmetry to a local gauge symmetry forces you to introduce the minimal coupling to the corresponding gauge field.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K