Symplectic geometry of phase space

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of symplectic geometry and symplectic manifolds, particularly in the context of Hamiltonian mechanics. Participants explore the differences between Hamilton's and Lagrange's formulations, the nature of phase space versus state space, and the utility of generalized momentum as coordinates.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks an intuitive understanding of symplectic geometry, mentioning its relation to area preservation in phase space and questioning the advantages of Hamilton's formulation over Lagrange's.
  • Another participant defines a symplectic manifold as a manifold with a symplectic form, clarifying that the symplectic form is a non-degenerate 2-form and not a metric.
  • It is noted that Hamilton's formalism simplifies the equations of motion to first order differential equations, highlighting the clarity of symmetries in phase space through the Poisson bracket.
  • A distinction is made between state space and phase space, with the latter described as the cotangent bundle of the former.
  • Using generalized momenta as coordinates is argued to simplify the form of the symplectic structure compared to using generalized velocities, akin to the advantages of Cartesian coordinates in Euclidean space.
  • One participant expresses appreciation for the clarity of the technical explanation provided.
  • A reference to a mathematical text on classical mechanics is shared, indicating a resource for further detailed study.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion presents multiple viewpoints on the nature and implications of symplectic geometry, with no consensus reached on the intuitive understanding of the concepts or the comparative advantages of the formulations discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants express varying levels of familiarity with the mathematical aspects of symplectic geometry, indicating potential limitations in understanding due to the complexity of the subject matter.

CrazyNeutrino
Messages
99
Reaction score
0
What is a symplectic manifold or symplectic geometry? (In intuitive terms please)
I have a vague understanding that it involves some metric that assigns an area to a position and conjugate momentum that happens to be preserved. What is 'special' about Hamilton's formulation that makes it more useful than Lagrange's? Why is it that phase space has this special geometry but state space does not? What makes the generalized momentum a more useful coordinate than the generalized velocity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A symplectic manifold is a manifold equipped with a symplectic form. The symplectic form is a non-degenerate 2-form, which makes it an anti-symmetric rather than symmetric tensor. It is not a metric.

Hamilton’s formalism reduces the equations of motion to the flow of a Hamiltonian vector field, which is a set of first order differential equations and the symmetries of the time evolution phase space are often more manifest and boil down to the Poisson bracket.

State space and phase space are different manifolds (the latter being the cotangent bundle of the former).

Using the generalised momenta as coordinates, the symplectic form takes a much easier form than if you use generalised velocities. Much like using Cartesian coordinates instead of curvilinear ones makes the metric take an easier form in Euclidean space.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71, CrazyNeutrino and dextercioby
Thank you, this is the most concise explanation I've seen yet!
 
A very good (but of course also very mathematical) explaning these things in detail is

V. I. Arnold, Mathematical Methods of Classical Mechanics, Springer Verlag (1989)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K