System of limited slip differentials with two power sources

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of a 4x4 vehicle system equipped with a conventional engine and limited slip differentials (LSDs), enhanced by the addition of electric motors. Participants explore how this configuration would function under acceleration, considering various factors such as power distribution, differential locking, and the implications of different driving conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes a scenario where a 4x4 system with a RIC engine and LSDs could distribute power evenly across all wheels, assuming optimal settings for the LSDs.
  • Another participant raises a concern that the RIC may act as a fulcrum, potentially reversing the drive from the electric motors to the front axle, suggesting that locking the middle differential could resolve this issue.
  • A participant speculates on the behavior of the system when one rear wheel is on solid ground and the other on ice, suggesting that the motor could cause the wheel on ice to spin.
  • One participant introduces an electrical analogy using transformers to represent the differentials, proposing that locking a differential is akin to grounding the transformer center tap.
  • Another participant requests to see the electrical model and discusses the simulation of LSD behavior through resistors in the analogy.
  • A later reply mentions that torque for different motors can be represented by different mutually prime frequencies and discusses adjusting parameters to simulate locking the center differential.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the RIC's role in the system and the effectiveness of locking differentials. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives on the behavior of the system under various conditions.

Contextual Notes

Participants have not defined specific settings for the LSDs, and there are assumptions regarding the road surface and tire grip that may affect the analysis. The discussion includes speculative scenarios that have not been experimentally validated.

howellrh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
My first ever post here, so hello world!
So I've attached an image of a conventional 4x4 system with one RIC engine and LSDs for all wheels so that all four wheels can be driven, or just one depending on conditions. the front/rear LSD may in fact be locked, but that isn't particularly important...
RIC + LSDs.gif

So if the front axle is at the bottom of the page, and the rear axle is at the top (the car is driving down your screen) and i added two electric motors where the rear brakes would usually go, then how would the system behave under acceleration? I know that removing the brakes isn't a great idea in real life, but for the purposes of this question its easier to describe it that way.
RIC + LSDs + Motors.gif

If you want numbers to play with then let's say the engine is 100kWm and the electric motors are 30kWm each and the LSDs can be whatever type you thing is best for this scenario
All the tyres are the same tread and grip, and we are assuming that the vehicle is on a level homogeneous road surface to keep it to the problem in hand.
My first conclusion on this problem is that the LSDs will sort themselves out (provided they have the right settings - which I can't define) and 1/4 of the overall 160kWm (that's 40kWm) would be applied to each wheel. I just can't decide if in reality the front/read LSD would think that the rear wheels were slipping and send all the power to the front initially, until the LSDs begin to limit the slip in the front/back...
also, what effect would locking the front/rear diff have? would it be better?
thanks to all for your help!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
There is a problem. The RIC will act as a fulcrum that may effectively reverse the drive from the electric motors to the front axle.
Locking the middle diff will eliminate the problem.
 
Baluncore said:
There is a problem. The RIC will act as a fulcrum that may effectively reverse the drive from the electric motors to the front axle.
Locking the middle diff will eliminate the problem.

howellrh said:
My first ever post here, so hello world!
So I've attached an image of a conventional 4x4 system with one RIC engine and LSDs for all wheels so that all four wheels can be driven, or just one depending on conditions. the front/rear LSD may in fact be locked, but that isn't particularly important...
View attachment 84856
So if the front axle is at the bottom of the page, and the rear axle is at the top (the car is driving down your screen) and i added two electric motors where the rear brakes would usually go, then how would the system behave under acceleration? I know that removing the brakes isn't a great idea in real life, but for the purposes of this question its easier to describe it that way.
View attachment 84854
If you want numbers to play with then let's say the engine is 100kWm and the electric motors are 30kWm each and the LSDs can be whatever type you thing is best for this scenario
All the tyres are the same tread and grip, and we are assuming that the vehicle is on a level homogeneous road surface to keep it to the problem in hand.
My first conclusion on this problem is that the LSDs will sort themselves out (provided they have the right settings - which I can't define) and 1/4 of the overall 160kWm (that's 40kWm) would be applied to each wheel. I just can't decide if in reality the front/read LSD would think that the rear wheels were slipping and send all the power to the front initially, until the LSDs begin to limit the slip in the front/back...
also, what effect would locking the front/rear diff have? would it be better?
thanks to all for your help!
Suppose the RIC is stopped and the rear LH wheel is on solid ground. If the RH rear wheel is on ice, I think the motor will cause it to spin.
By the way, I have drawn myself an electrical analogue of the set up, using transformers for the differentials. When a differential locks, it seems to be equivalent to grounding the transformer centre tap.
 
tech99 said:
By the way, I have drawn myself an electrical analogue of the set up, using transformers for the differentials.
Can you please attach a copy of your model to a post.
tech99 said:
When a differential locks, it seems to be equivalent to grounding the transformer centre tap.
I would have thought that pinion drive would be through the centre tap with a resistor between the opposite ends to simulate a LSD. A short between the opposite ends would emulate a locked diff.
 
Baluncore said:
Can you please attach a copy of your model to a post.

I would have thought that pinion drive would be through the centre tap with a resistor between the opposite ends to simulate a LSD. A short between the opposite ends would emulate a locked diff.
I have tried to attach my diagram of the electrical analogue. Sorry if it does not work.
 

Attachments

  • differential (2).jpg
    differential (2).jpg
    27.6 KB · Views: 536
This is my transformer analogy. Torque for different motors is identified by different mutually prime frequencies.
Change the value of R_lock to lock the centre diff.
 

Attachments

  • AWD.png
    AWD.png
    10.4 KB · Views: 544

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K