T or F? The prime field of R=Q[sqrt(2)] then Frac(R)=Reals

  • Thread starter Thread starter robertjordan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Prime
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of the fraction field of the ring R = Q[√2], specifically questioning whether Frac(R) equals the reals. Participants explore the implications of countability and the nature of elements within Frac(R).

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to demonstrate that π is not an element of Frac(R) by contradiction, leading to questions about the implications of countability. There is discussion about finding a bijection between Frac(R) and the natural numbers to establish countability.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the countability of Frac(R) and suggested methods for establishing a mapping from a countable set to Frac(R). The conversation is ongoing, with various interpretations and approaches being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is a reference to the back of the book stating that the original claim is false, which influences the participants' reasoning. The nature of the elements in Frac(R) and their relationship to the reals is under scrutiny.

robertjordan
Messages
71
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If [itex]R=\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{2}][/itex], then Frac(R)=[itex]\mathbb{R}[/itex]

Homework Equations



[itex]\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{2}]=\{a+b\sqrt{2} | a,b\in{\mathbb{Q}}\}[/itex]
Frac(R) is the fraction field of R is basically [itex]\{\frac{a+b\sqrt{2}}{c+d\sqrt{2}} | a,b,c,d\in{\mathbb{Q}}\}[/itex].

The Attempt at a Solution


Back of the book says false...

I tried to show [itex]\pi\not\in{Frac(R)}[/itex] by assuming by way of contradiction that there existed [itex]a,b,c,d\in{\mathbb{Q}}[/itex] s.t. [itex]\frac{a+b\sqrt{2}}{c+d\sqrt{2}}=\pi[/itex].

That implies [itex]c\pi+d\pi\sqrt{2}=a+b\sqrt{2}[/itex] ... this led nowhere :(
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
robertjordan said:

Homework Statement



If [itex]R=\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{2}][/itex], then Frac(R)=[itex]\mathbb{R}[/itex]

Homework Equations



[itex]\mathbb{Q}[\sqrt{2}]=\left{a+b\sqrt{2} | a,b\in{\mathbb{Q}}\right}[/itex]
Frac(R) is the fraction field of R is basically [itex]\left{\frac{a+b\sqrt{2}}{c+d\sqrt{2}} | a,b,c,d\in{\mathbb{Q}}\right}[/itex].

The Attempt at a Solution


Back of the book says false...

I tried to show [itex]\pi\not\in{Frac(R)}[/itex] by assuming by way of contradiction that there existed [itex]a,b,c,d\in{\mathbb{Q}}[/itex] s.t. [itex]\frac{a+b\sqrt{2}}{c+d\sqrt{2}}=\pi[/itex].

That implies [itex]c\pi+d\pi\sqrt{2}=a+b\sqrt{2}[/itex] ... this led nowhere :(

Frac(R) is countable, isn't it?
 
Dick said:
Frac(R) is countable, isn't it?

Thanks for the response.

If we could show Frac(R) is countable, we could conclude Frac(R)=/=reals because the reals are uncountable.

How can we show Frac(R) is countable? My friend said a way to show countability is to find a bijection between Frac(R) and the natural numbers...

Could we do something like this... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantor_pairing_function#Cantor_pairing_function?
 
robertjordan said:
Thanks for the response.

If we could show Frac(R) is countable, we could conclude Frac(R)=/=reals because the reals are uncountable.

How can we show Frac(R) is countable? My friend said a way to show countability is to find a bijection between Frac(R) and the natural numbers...

Could we do something like this... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantor_pairing_function#Cantor_pairing_function?

That's the basis of it. That shows that |NxN|=|N|. You don't need to directly construct the bijection. If you can show that if there is a map from a countable set ONTO Frac(R) then you know Frac(R) is countable. If you pick a tuple of four rational numbers (a,b,c,d) there an obvious way to map that to an element of Frac(R), right? So that's a mapping from QxQxQxQ -> Frac(R). Now you know Q is countable, right?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K