Table of Connection Coefficients

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the search for a table of connection coefficients related to Nordstrom's 1913 scalar theory of gravity. Participants explore the implications of this theory on various geometric constructs such as the metric, connection coefficients, Riemann tensor, Ricci tensor, and Ricci scalar.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant seeks a table that includes various geometric quantities for Nordstrom's theory.
  • Another participant questions whether Nordstrom's scalar theory lacks tensors due to its scalar nature.
  • A different participant asserts that Nordstrom's theory is still geometric and provides a specific form for the metric.
  • There are inquiries about the meaning of the term "conformal factor" and the advantages of using an exponential function in the metric.
  • Questions arise regarding the possibility of applying the scalar conformal factor unevenly across different components of the metric.
  • A participant suggests that the exponential function ensures positivity and offers an alternative representation of the conformal factor.
  • There is a request for a basic review article or reference on Nordstrom's scalar theory that is accessible online.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of tensors in Nordstrom's theory, with some asserting that it is a geometric theory while others question the presence of tensors. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the application of the conformal factor and the best approach for the metric.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about the nature of scalar theories and their relation to geometric constructs are not fully explored. The discussion includes unresolved questions about the mathematical representation of the metric and the implications of using different functions as conformal factors.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying gravitational theories, particularly scalar theories, and those looking for resources related to Nordstrom's work.

glamotte7
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I'm trying to find a table of basic connection coefficients. My GREAT desire is to find a table that includes the metric, connection coeffs, Riemann tensor, Ricci tensor and Ricci scalar for NORDSTROM's 1913 scalar theory of gravity.

Does anyone know an online source of this info?

glamotte7
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since Nordstrom's theory is a scalar theory, wouldn't it lack these tensors? That's just my thought, but I don't know much about his theory.
 
Nordstrom's theory is still a geometric theory of gravity. The metric is always a conformal factor times Minkowski space:

[tex]ds^2 = e^{2 \phi} \, (-dt^2 + dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2)[/tex]

It is very easy to compute the Christoffel symbols and curvature tensors for this metric. Why don't you try it!
 
For small ∅ this would be 1 + (2∅), correct?

What does the word conformal factor mean? Why is it advantageous to use an exponential as opposed to some other function? I've seen other important GR equations solved beginning with an arbitrary exponential. Why is this the best approach for a solution?

Lastly, I'm new here. How do you type math expressions like dx^2, etc?
 
Also, in Nordstrom's scalar theory, can't the scalar conformal factor be multiplied in an unequal fashion times -dt,dx,dy and dz? For example, can't dy and dz remain multiplied by 1 rather than multiplied by the factor, which in this case the factor would only affect dt and dx?
 
glamotte7 said:
Why is it advantageous to use an exponential as opposed to some other function?

The exponential is just to remind us that it has to be a positive number. Set [itex]\phi = \log u[/itex] if you want, it doesn't matter.

glamotte7 said:
Also, in Nordstrom's scalar theory, can't the scalar conformal factor be multiplied in an unequal fashion times -dt,dx,dy and dz?

No.
 
Are you aware of a basic review article or reference on Nordstrom's scalar theory, accessible online?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
13K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K