Taking the derivative of a function of a function

ArisMartinez
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Summary:: According to Yale’s University PHYS: 200:
v*(dv/dt) = d(v^2/2)/dt

Could someone explain how has he reached that conclusion? He claims to be some standard derivation rules, but I can’t find anything about it.

As much as I can tell: (dv/dt)* v = v’ * v = a* v

thanks!

[Moderator's note: moved from a technical forum.]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know the chain rule? What is ##\dfrac{d}{dt} v(t)^2##?
 
  • Like
Likes ArisMartinez
fresh_42 said:
Do you know the chain rule? What is ##\dfrac{d}{dt} v(t)^2##?
I do! But I coudn not see why I had to use the chain rule here. (I see it clearer when I have ie. (cos(x))^sin(x))

but I do now! I’m not used to the physics notation of derivatives. But that was helpful, so thanks a lot.
 
ArisMartinez said:
Could someone explain how has he reached that conclusion? He claims to be some standard derivation rules, but I can’t find anything about it.
If you're taking the derivative of a function of a function; e.g., something like this: ##\frac d{dx} f(g(x))##, the differentiation rule that should come to mind is the chain rule.
 
Prove $$\int\limits_0^{\sqrt2/4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx = \frac{\pi^2}{8}.$$ Let $$I = \int\limits_0^{\sqrt 2 / 4}\frac{1}{\sqrt{x-x^2}}\arcsin\sqrt{\frac{(x-1)\left(x-1+x\sqrt{9-16x}\right)}{1-2x}} \, \mathrm dx. \tag{1}$$ The representation integral of ##\arcsin## is $$\arcsin u = \int\limits_{0}^{1} \frac{\mathrm dt}{\sqrt{1-t^2}}, \qquad 0 \leqslant u \leqslant 1.$$ Plugging identity above into ##(1)## with ##u...
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top