Taking the derivative of a function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on taking the derivative of the function $$\mathrm{G}_{t+1}=\mathrm{g}_{0}\mathrm{e}^{-qHt}$$ with respect to $$G_t$$. Participants clarify that the equation provided does not explicitly include $$G_t$$, making the request for its derivative nonsensical without additional context or definitions. The consensus is that a proper formulation of $$G(t)$$ is necessary to proceed with differentiation. The conversation highlights the importance of clear problem statements in mathematical inquiries.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically differentiation.
  • Familiarity with exponential functions and their properties.
  • Knowledge of difference equations and their relation to derivatives.
  • Basic grasp of mathematical notation, including LaTeX formatting.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of difference equations and their derivatives.
  • Learn how to formulate functions in terms of independent variables, such as $$G(t)$$.
  • Explore the application of exponential functions in mathematical modeling.
  • Investigate finite difference methods for numerical analysis.
USEFUL FOR

Students, mathematicians, and anyone interested in calculus, particularly those dealing with derivatives of functions in mathematical modeling or physics contexts.

mathgenie
Messages
8
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Derivative with respect to Gt of a function
I would like to take the derivative of the following function with respect to Gt:
$$\mathrm{G}_{t+1}=\mathrm{g}_{0}\mathrm{e}^{-qHt}$$

I think that the answer is either -1 or ##\mathrm{e}^{-qHt}-1##
If you could show the calculations that would be a great help.
Thanks very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathgenie said:
TL;DR Summary: Derivative with respect to Gt of a function

I would like to take the derivative of the following function with respect to Gt:
What does this mean exactly?
 
Can you see the latex equation?
 
mathgenie said:
Can you see the latex equation?
Yes.
 
I think a clue is that F(G)=Gt+1 -Gt and we want F’(G)
 
mathgenie said:
I think a clue is that F(G)=Gt+1 -Gt and we want F’(G)
What about a complete statement of the problem?
 
I’ve given as much info as I can at the moment. If I was a math boff I wouldn’t be asking for help!
 
The problem as stated isn't solvable. The righthand side has no mention of ##G_t##.

and your comment that F(G)=Gt+1 -Gt = F'(G) is ambiguous.

Did you mean? ##F(G) = G_{t+1} - G_t = G(t+1) - G(t)##

What is the context of the problem? Is this for a QM physics problem?
 
To reiterate, I am looking for the derivative of the difference equation ##f(G)=\mathrm{G}_{t+1}-\mathrm{G}_{t}## with respect to G.
 
  • #10
It's just for my personal interest.
 
  • #11
What I meant by context is where did this equation appear? Is it from a broader physics problem?

From what you've written ##G_t = G(t)## and we are stuck because we don't know what G(t) means. You've provided a ##G_{t+1}## equation so are we to assume that

##G(t) = 0##

and ##G(t+1) = g_0 e^{-qHt}##

and that ##g_0## , ##H##, and ##q## are constants and that ##e## is exponential function?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gmax137
  • #12
mathgenie said:
I think a clue is that F(G)=Gt+1 -Gt and we want F’(G)
Why don't you write it explicitly, ##G_{t-1}=g_0e^{-qH_{t-1}}##, I assume, from the definition of ##G_t##?
 
  • #13
mathgenie said:
I would like to take the derivative of the following function with respect to Gt:
$$\mathrm{G}_{t+1}=\mathrm{g}_{0}\mathrm{e}^{-qHt}$$
The above is not a function of ##G_t##, so asking for the derivative of G with respect to ##G_t## doesn't make any sense. In the equation above, g, H, and ##g_0## appear to be constants (you haven't said what these are), and the only independent variable appears to be t. It would make sense to ask about G'(t) if you had a formula for G(t).
mathgenie said:
To reiterate, I am looking for the derivative of the difference equation ##f(G)=\mathrm{G}_{t+1}-\mathrm{G}_{t}## with respect to G.
This doesn't make any sense, either. With an explicit formula for G(t), you could find G'(t); i.e., the derivative of G with respect to t.
 
  • #14
Dear all, I just wanted to thank those of you for taking a look at my post and providing suggestions. Forums like these are invaluable and although I did not get an answer to my question (no doubt due to poor phrasing of the question) I appreciate all of your time and effort in considering this question.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #15
@mathgenie , maybe you're considering finite element methods?
 
  • #16
WWGD said:
@mathgenie , maybe you're considering finite element methods?
Or solving difference equations? The terms "first difference," "second difference," and so on are analogues to first derivative, second derivative, and so on for derivatives.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WWGD

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K