Tangent to reparameterized curve

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter monea83
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curve Tangent
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the reparameterization of curves in the context of differential geometry, specifically how to derive the tangent of a reparameterized curve \(\tau = \gamma \circ f\) using the chain rule. The key result established is that \(\tau_* = f' \cdot \gamma_* \circ f\), where \(f'\) is the derivative of the reparameterization function \(f\). The participants clarify the application of the chain rule and the notation used in the derivation, emphasizing the importance of precise definitions in mathematical expressions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential geometry concepts, particularly curves and tangents.
  • Familiarity with the chain rule in calculus.
  • Knowledge of smooth manifolds and their properties.
  • Experience with notation and terminology in mathematical texts, specifically in the context of reparameterization.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the chain rule in differential geometry.
  • Read "Introduction to Smooth Manifolds" by John Lee for a deeper understanding of manifold theory.
  • Explore the concepts of tangent vectors in the context of smooth curves.
  • Investigate the notation used in "Tensor Analysis on Manifolds" by Bishop & Goldberg for clarity on mathematical expressions.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of differential geometry, and anyone interested in the rigorous study of curves and manifolds will benefit from this discussion.

monea83
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Given is a curve \gamma from \mathbb{R} \rightarrow M for some manifold M. The tangent to \gamma at c is defined as

(\gamma_*c)g = \frac{dg \circ {\gamma}}{du}(c)

Now, the curve is to be reparameterized so that \tau = \gamma \circ f, with f defining the reparametrization. (f' > 0 everywhere)

The book I'm reading claims that \tau_* = f' \cdot \gamma_* \circ f, however I do not quite see how this result is derived.

Using the chain rule, I get

<br /> (\tau_*c)g = \frac{dg \circ \gamma \circ f}{du}(c) =\frac{dg \circ \gamma \circ f}{df} \cdot \frac{df}{du}(c)<br />

The second part of the rhs is obviously f', but how is the first part equal to \gamma_* \circ f?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your notation is really bad. Try this:

The tangent to \gamma at \gamma(u_0) is the tangent vector \gamma_{*,u_0} defined by

<br /> (\gamma_{*,u_0})g := \frac{d(g \circ {\gamma})}{du}(u_0)<br />

So, for \tau:= \gamma \circ f a reparametrization, the chain rule yields

<br /> (\tau_{*,t_0})g = \frac{d(g \circ \gamma \circ f)}{dt}(t_0) =\frac{d(g \circ \gamma)}{du}(f(t_0)) \frac{df}{dt}(t_0)=f&#039;(t_0)(\gamma_{*,f(t_0)})g<br />

That is to say,

\tau_{*,t_0}=f&#039;(t_0)\cdot \gamma_{*,f(t_0)}

for all t_0.

Or, even more compactly,

\tau_*=f&#039;\cdot \gamma_{*}\circ f

I highly recommend the book Introduction to Smooth Manifolds by John Lee.
 
Last edited:
Thank you very much, I think I can work it out now!

When you say my notation is bad, are you referring to my application of the chain rule (which I believe is flawed), or to the notation in which the problem was posed (which was taken from "Tensor analysis on manifolds", Bishop & Goldberg)?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K