Tattoos & Physics: Will Visible Ink Affect My Career?

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
10 replies · 6K views
Felix Gonzales
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I couldn't find an appropriate area for this so I figured general was my best bet. My question, to be more specific than my header, is will visible tattoos affect me if I choose to pursue some type of research job in physics? I love tattoos and Physics but I don't want to ruin my chances of my dream job because I wanted some ink. I wouldn't tattoo my face. Probably, at most, my neck and down. I just wanted experienced opinions because I've formulated my own but it's not an experienced one or educated one. Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
My bet is, it will lower your chances although I doubt that anyone will ever admit this.
In former times tattoos had been the equivalent to either a seaman or a jailbird. Since approximately two decades tattoos have become a fashion. However, the first ones who established this trend weren't the brightest stars in the sky, so this entire history will probably play a role in people's mind and judgement - told or not.
 
I don't think that tattoos are not professional. If employers have their own prejudies it doesn't mean that a person with tats will work worse than the one without them.

I was also thinking of getting something like this one below, but I was applying for a job that time and expected the employer to reject my candidature. Noe I'm still thinking of getting it. What do you think?
https://tattoozza.com/3d-tattoos
13731164405.jpg
 
Felix Gonzales said:
My question, to be more specific than my header, is will visible tattoos affect me if I choose to pursue some type of research job in physics?

It's highly unlikely that the presence of tattoos will play any role in your getting hired in academia with a couple of possible exceptions. Tattoos are pretty popular these days and I don't think anyone wants to miss out on the right candidate because of something so superficial. And at the end of the day, the decisive factors for research positions tend to come down to the skill set that you bring to the table, evidence of past success, and how well you would fit in with the established team and the direction the group wants to go in. Even if there was some kind of effect statistically, it would be so far down the list that it wouldn't be worth worrying about.

The exceptions would be if the tattoo is overly offensive or derogatory in nature. Hiring committees would likely think twice about hiring someone with racist tattoos for example. In other cases the line between what's offensive or not can be somewhat subjective.
 
Smith777 said:
I don't think that tattoos are not professional. If employers have their own prejudies it doesn't mean that a person with tats will work worse than the one without them.

I was also thinking of getting something like this one below, but I was applying for a job that time and expected the employer to reject my candidature. Noe I'm still thinking of getting it. What do you think?
https://tattoozza.com/3d-tattoos
View attachment 205696
You got to deal with things as they are; of course a person with tattoo can be professional , but what matters is not whether this is true, but what your potential employer believes/wants. Or maybe you want to live on your terms and get a tattoo, but there is a price to pay for this choice. I would think business types would be less tolerant than academic types about it.